Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: imx93: Move IMX93_CLK_END macro to clk driver
From: Pengfei Li <hidden>
Date: 2024-08-06 08:38:29
Also in:
imx, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, lkml
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 08:28:14PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 19/07/2024 08:08, Pengfei Li wrote:quoted
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 10:49:49AM +0800, Pengfei Li wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 09:38:54AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
On 27/06/2024 10:24, Pengfei Li wrote:quoted
IMX93_CLK_END was previously defined in imx93-clock.h to indicate the number of clocks, but it is not part of the ABI, so it should be moved to clk driver. Signed-off-by: Pengfei Li <redacted> --- Notes: Change for v2: - Use pre-processor define to simplify code. drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)Are you sure this builds fine? If you need to define it here, it means some part of that unit file already uses the define. If so, you include the header. If you include the header, you should see fat warning. Really, people, just build your patches... Best regards, KrzysztofHi Krzysztof, Yes, you're right, this macro definition has indeed been used. But this clk-imx93.c driver file is the only place where this macro is used. So maybe it would be more appropriate to define this macro in C rather than in the header file. Meanwhile, I also built my patch, but no warnings were found. BR, Pengfei LiHi Krzysztof, I've built my patches, but no warnings were found. This C file is the only place where this macro definition is used, so why would I see fat warning?I could be wrong, I really thought there should be a warning of duplicated define. But if there is none, sure, sounds good. Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, If this patchset is ok, could you help merge it? Otherwise I won't be able to send subsequent patches. BR, Pengfei