Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: hyperv: Use SMC to detect hypervisor presence
From: Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: 2024-08-05 03:53:41
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-arch, linux-hyperv, linux-pci, lkml
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 03:59:04PM -0700, Roman Kisel wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The arm64 Hyper-V startup path relies on ACPI to detect running under a Hyper-V compatible hypervisor. That doesn't work on non-ACPI systems. Hoist the ACPI detection logic into a separate function, use the new SMC added recently to Hyper-V to use in the non-ACPI case. Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <redacted> --- arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c index b1a4de4eee29..341f98312667 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c +++ b/arch/arm64/hyperv/mshyperv.c@@ -27,6 +27,34 @@ int hv_get_hypervisor_version(union hv_hypervisor_version_info *info) return 0; } +static bool hyperv_detect_via_acpi(void) +{ + if (acpi_disabled) + return false; +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) + /* Hypervisor ID is only available in ACPI v6+. */ + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision < 6) + return false; + return strncmp((char *)&acpi_gbl_FADT.hypervisor_id, "MsHyperV", 8) == 0; +#else + return false; +#endif +} + +static bool hyperv_detect_via_smc(void) +{ + struct arm_smccc_res res = {}; + + if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() != SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC) + return false; + arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID, &res); + + return res.a0 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_0 && + res.a1 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_1 && + res.a2 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_2 && + res.a3 == ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_UID_HYPERV_REG_3; +}
As you mentioned in the cover letter this is supported in latest Hyper-V hypervisor, can we add a comment about it, specifying the exact version in it would be great. If someone attempts to build non-ACPI kernel on older Hyper-V what is the behaviour of this function, do we need to safeguard or handle that case ? - Saurabh