Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Support s2idle/s2ram on PREEMPT_RT

[PATCH v2 0/7] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Support s2idle/s2ram on PREEMPT_RT · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-05-27
[PATCH v2 1/7] pmdomain: core: Enable s2idle for CPU PM domains on PREEMPT_RT · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-05-27
Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] pmdomain: core: Enable s2idle for CPU PM domains on PREEMPT_RT · Nikunj Kela <hidden> · 2024-05-28
Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] pmdomain: core: Enable s2idle for CPU PM domains on PREEMPT_RT · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-05-30
Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] pmdomain: core: Enable s2idle for CPU PM domains on PREEMPT_RT · Nikunj Kela <hidden> · 2024-05-30
Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] pmdomain: core: Enable s2idle for CPU PM domains on PREEMPT_RT · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-06-03
Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] pmdomain: core: Enable s2idle for CPU PM domains on PREEMPT_RT · Nikunj Kela <hidden> · 2024-06-04
[PATCH v2 2/7] pmdomain: core: Don't hold the genpd-lock when calling dev_pm_domain_set() · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-05-27
[PATCH v2 3/7] pmdomain: core: Use dev_name() instead of kobject_get_path() in debugfs · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-05-27
Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] pmdomain: core: Use dev_name() instead of kobject_get_path() in debugfs · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2024-08-20
Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] pmdomain: core: Use dev_name() instead of kobject_get_path() in debugfs · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-08-20
Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] pmdomain: core: Use dev_name() instead of kobject_get_path() in debugfs · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2024-08-30
Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] pmdomain: core: Use dev_name() instead of kobject_get_path() in debugfs · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2024-09-02
Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] pmdomain: core: Use dev_name() instead of kobject_get_path() in debugfs · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-09-03
[PATCH v2 4/7] cpuidle: psci-domain: Enable system-wide suspend on PREEMPT_RT · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-05-27
[PATCH v2 5/7] cpuidle: psci: Drop redundant assignment of CPUIDLE_FLAG_RCU_IDLE · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-05-27
[PATCH v2 6/7] cpuidle: psci: Enable the hierarchical topology for s2ram on PREEMPT_RT · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-05-27
[PATCH v2 7/7] cpuidle: psci: Enable the hierarchical topology for s2idle on PREEMPT_RT · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-05-27
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Support s2idle/s2ram on PREEMPT_RT · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2024-07-08
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Support s2idle/s2ram on PREEMPT_RT · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-07-09
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Support s2idle/s2ram on PREEMPT_RT · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2024-07-31
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Support s2idle/s2ram on PREEMPT_RT · Raghavendra Kakarla <hidden> · 2024-07-25
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Support s2idle/s2ram on PREEMPT_RT · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2024-08-05

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2024-07-31 08:15:50
Also in: linux-pm, linux-rt-users, lkml

On 2024-07-09 17:31:12 [+0200], Ulf Hansson wrote:

Thanks for taking a look and for providing your thoughts. Can I
consider that as an "ack" for the whole series?

Yes.

Sebastian

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help