Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: clocks: add binding for voltage-controlled-oscillators
From: Dragan Simic <hidden>
Date: 2024-07-16 17:54:09
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-rockchip, lkml
Hello Conor, On 2024-07-16 18:15, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 01:02:49PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:quoted
In contrast to fixed clocks that are described as ungateable, boards sometimes use additional oscillators for things like PCIe reference clocks, that need actual supplies to get enabled and enable-gpios to be toggled for them to work. This adds a binding for such oscillators that are not configurable themself, but need to handle supplies for them to work. In schematics they often can be seen as ---------------- Enable - | 100MHz,3.3V, | - VDD | 3225 | GND - | | - OUT ---------------- or similar. The enable pin might be separate but can also just be tied to the vdd supply, hence it is optional in the binding. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> --- .../bindings/clock/voltage-oscillator.yaml | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/voltage-oscillator.yamldiff --gita/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/voltage-oscillator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/voltage-oscillator.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..8bff6b0fd582e--- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/voltage-oscillator.yaml@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/voltage-oscillator.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: Voltage controlled oscillatorVoltage controlled oscillator? Really? That sounds far too similar to a VCO to me, and the input voltage here (according to the description at least) does not affect the frequency of oscillation.
Yup, "voltage controlled oscillator" really isn't the right choice for the name, as I wrote about already. [1] [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/ec84dc37e2c421ee6d31294e08392d57@manjaro.org/ (local)
Why the dedicated binding, rather than adding a supply and enable-gpio to the existing "fixed-clock" binding? I suspect that a large portion of "fixed-clock"s actually require a supply that is (effectively) always-on.quoted
+ +maintainers: + - Heiko Stuebner [off-list ref] + +properties: + compatible: + const: voltage-oscillator + + "#clock-cells": + const: 0 + + clock-frequency: true + + clock-output-names: + maxItems: 1 + + enable-gpios: + description: + Contains a single GPIO specifier for the GPIO that enables and disables + the oscillator. + maxItems: 1 + + vdd-supply: + description: handle of the regulator that provides the supply voltage + +required: + - compatible + - "#clock-cells" + - clock-frequency + - vdd-supply + +additionalProperties: false + +examples: + - | + voltage-oscillator { + compatible = "voltage-oscillator"; + #clock-cells = <0>; + clock-frequency = <1000000000>; + vdd-supply = <®_vdd>; + }; +... -- 2.39.2_______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip