Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 5 authors, 2024-05-29
STALE730d
Revisions (7)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v2 current
  4. v3 [diff vs current]
  5. v4 [diff vs current]
  6. v4 [diff vs current]
  7. v5 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v2 resend 1/8] gpu: drm: use for_each_endpoint_of_node()

From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: 2024-05-28 23:55:29
Also in: dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-media, linux-staging
Subsystem: drm drivers, drm drivers and misc gpu patches, drm drivers for ti omap, the rest · Maintainers: David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, Tomi Valkeinen, Linus Torvalds

We already have for_each_endpoint_of_node(), don't use
of_graph_get_next_endpoint() directly. Replace it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/base.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/base.c
index 050ca7eafac58..5f8002f6bb7a5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/base.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/base.c
@@ -242,8 +242,7 @@ static void omapdss_walk_device(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
 
 	of_node_put(n);
 
-	n = NULL;
-	while ((n = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(node, n)) != NULL) {
+	for_each_endpoint_of_node(node, n) {
 		struct device_node *pn = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(n);
 
 		if (!pn)
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help