On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 04:55:04PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2024-03-22 at 16:37 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted
I agree that nothing really breaks, but I also hold the view that
broken firmware implementations should be given the finger, specially
given that you have done this work *ahead* of the spec. I would really
like this to fail immediately on these and not even try to suspend.
With that in mind, if doesn't really matter whether HIBERNATE_OFF is
mandatory or not. We really should check for it and pretend it doesn't
exist if the correct flag isn't set.
Ack.
I'll rename that variable to 'psci_system_off2_hibernate_supported' then.
static void __init psci_init_system_off2(void)
{
int ret;
ret = psci_features(PSCI_FN_NATIVE(1_3, SYSTEM_OFF2));
if (ret < 0)
return;
if (ret & (1 << PSCI_1_3_HIBERNATE_TYPE_OFF))
psci_system_off2_hibernate_supported = true;
Ah OK, you have already agreed to do this, please ignore my response then.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel