Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 4 authors, 2024-03-15
STALE855d LANDED

[PATCH] cpufreq: dt: always allocate zeroed cpumask

From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Date: 2024-03-14 12:56:30
Also in: linux-mm, linux-pm, lkml, stable
Subsystem: cpu frequency scaling framework, the rest · Maintainers: "Rafael J. Wysocki", Viresh Kumar, Linus Torvalds

Commit 0499a78369ad ("ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase
supported CPUs to 512") changed the handling of cpumasks on ARM 64bit,
what resulted in the strange issues and warnings during cpufreq-dt
initialization on some big.LITTLE platforms.

This was caused by mixing OPPs between big and LITTLE cores, because
OPP-sharing information between big and LITTLE cores is computed on
cpumask, which in turn was not zeroed on allocation. Fix this by
switching to zalloc_cpumask_var() call.

Fixes: dc279ac6e5b4 ("cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index 8bd6e5e8f121..2d83bbc65dd0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static int dt_cpufreq_early_init(struct device *dev, int cpu)
 	if (!priv)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&priv->cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
+	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&priv->cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, priv->cpus);
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help