[PATCH v10 4/4] remoteproc: zynqmp: parse TCM from device tree
From: Tanmay Shah <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-13 17:55:29
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-remoteproc, lkml
Subsystem:
remote processor (remoteproc) subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier, Linus Torvalds
ZynqMP TCM information was fixed in driver. Now ZynqMP TCM information
is available in device-tree. Parse TCM information in driver
as per new bindings.
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <redacted>
---
Changes in v10:
- Remove redundant changes to handle TCM in lockstep mode
Changes in v9:
- Introduce new API to request and release core1 TCM power-domains in
lockstep mode. This will be used during prepare -> add_tcm_banks
callback to enable TCM in lockstep mode.
- Parse TCM from device-tree in lockstep mode and split mode in
uniform way.
- Fix TCM representation in device-tree in lockstep mode.
Changes in v8:
- Remove pm_domains framework
- Remove checking of pm_domain_id validation to power on/off tcm
- Remove spurious change
- parse power-domains property from device-tree and use EEMI calls
to power on/off TCM instead of using pm domains framework
Changes in v7:
- move checking of pm_domain_id from previous patch
- fix mem_bank_data memory allocation
drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
index 42b0384d34f2..49e8eaf83fce 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c@@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ struct mbox_info { }; /* - * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will be removed once TCM bindings are - * accepted for system-dt specifications and upstreamed in linux kernel + * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will stay in driver to maintain backward + * compatibility with device-tree that does not have TCM information. */ static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks_split[] = { {0xffe00000UL, 0x0, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
@@ -757,6 +757,103 @@ static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev) return ERR_PTR(ret); } +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster) +{ + int i, j, tcm_bank_count, ret, tcm_pd_idx, pd_count; + struct of_phandle_args out_args = {0}; + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; + struct platform_device *cpdev; + struct mem_bank_data *tcm; + struct device_node *np; + struct resource *res; + u64 abs_addr, size; + struct device *dev; + + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) { + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i]; + dev = r5_core->dev; + np = r5_core->np; + + pd_count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains", + "#power-domain-cells"); + + if (pd_count <= 0) { + dev_err(dev, "invalid power-domains property, %d\n", pd_count); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* First entry in power-domains list is for r5 core, rest for TCM. */ + tcm_bank_count = pd_count - 1; + + if (tcm_bank_count <= 0) { + dev_err(dev, "invalid TCM count %d\n", tcm_bank_count); + return -EINVAL; + } + + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count, + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks) + ret = -ENOMEM; + + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count; + for (j = 0, tcm_pd_idx = 1; j < tcm_bank_count; j++, tcm_pd_idx++) { + tcm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct mem_bank_data), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tcm) + return -ENOMEM; + + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] = tcm; + + /* Get power-domains id of TCM. */ + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains", + "#power-domain-cells", + tcm_pd_idx, &out_args); + if (ret) { + dev_err(r5_core->dev, + "failed to get tcm %d pm domain, ret %d\n", + tcm_pd_idx, ret); + return ret; + } + tcm->pm_domain_id = out_args.args[0]; + of_node_put(out_args.np); + + /* Get TCM address without translation. */ + ret = of_property_read_reg(np, j, &abs_addr, &size); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reg property\n"); + return ret; + } + + /* + * Remote processor can address only 32 bits + * so convert 64-bits into 32-bits. This will discard + * any unwanted upper 32-bits. + */ + tcm->da = (u32)abs_addr; + tcm->size = (u32)size; + + cpdev = to_platform_device(dev); + res = platform_get_resource(cpdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, j); + if (!res) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get tcm resource\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + tcm->addr = (u32)res->start; + tcm->bank_name = (char *)res->name; + res = devm_request_mem_region(dev, tcm->addr, tcm->size, + tcm->bank_name); + if (!res) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to request tcm resource\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + } + } + + return 0; +} + /** * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node() * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
@@ -835,9 +932,14 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster, struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core; int ret, i; - ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster); - if (ret < 0) { - dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret); + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[0]; + if (of_find_property(r5_core->np, "reg", NULL)) + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(cluster); + else + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster); + + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm, err %d\n", ret); return ret; }
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel