Re: [PATCH 14/22] platform/chrome: cros_typec_switch: Add support for signaling HPD to drm_bridge
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-11 09:00:41
Also in:
chrome-platform, linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-patches, lkml
On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 10:52, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2024-02-10 06:10:31)quoted
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 09:14, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_typec_switch.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_typec_switch.c index 769de2889f2f..d8fb6662cf8d 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_typec_switch.c +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_typec_switch.c@@ -18,6 +19,15 @@ #include <linux/usb/typec_mux.h> #include <linux/usb/typec_retimer.h> +#include <drm/drm_bridge.h> +#include <drm/drm_print.h> + +struct cros_typec_dp_bridge { + struct cros_typec_switch_data *sdata; + bool hpd_enabled; + struct drm_bridge bridge; +};Is there any chance that you can use drm_dp_hpd_bridge_register() / drm_aux_hpd_bridge_notify() instead of implementing another drm_bridge? If something is missing from the existing implementation we can probably work that out.Yeah I think that can work. I had put the drm_bridge in this driver because I needed a 'struct device' per DP phy, but I think that problem goes away with an auxiliary device, so that is nicely solved. I'll have to add logic about typec ports to that auxiliary driver though, like mapping data-lanes and handling lane assignments. And then I'll move this code from the cros_typec_switch driver to the cros_ec_typec driver so it can be called outside of the typec mux set path. That's probably better because it's sort of bolted on to the cros_typec_switch driver. We'll need to know if the DP phy needs to handle orientation or if the EC is doing that somehow, so probably I'll need to add a DT property to the google,cros-ec-typec binding to indicate that orientation control is needed.
I still haven't fully got into your usage of data-lanes. I hope to be able to comment on that part and on the ports / endpoints tomorrow.
It looks like I should add a new auxiliary device, like 'dp_typec_bridge', and have some other function like drm_dp_typec_bridge_register() for that. I can wrap the 'struct drm_aux_hpd_bridge_data' with a 'struct drm_aux_typec_bridge_data' and then the typec port information can live there. HPD can still be signaled with drm_aux_hpd_bridge_notify() but other functions can be used to set the active typec port, e.g. drm_aux_typec_bridge_set_active_port(), and then get orientation with typec_get_orientation() in the atomic_check().
-- With best wishes Dmitry _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel