Re: [PATCH v5 00/25] Transparent Contiguous PTEs for User Mappings
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Date: 2024-02-09 08:54:41
Also in:
linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, lkml
On 08/02/2024 17:34, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 08:07:31AM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:quoted
Hi All,Hi Ryan, I assume this is the same as your 'features/granule_perf/contpte-lkml_v' branch on https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-rr/
Yep - great detective work! features/granule_perf/contpte-lkml_v5 corresponds exactly to what I posted with all the dependencies in place.
I've taken a quick look, and I have a few initial/superficial comments before digging into the detail on the important changes.
Thanks for doing this!
quoted
Patch Layout ============ In this version, I've split the patches to better show each optimization: - 1-2: mm prep: misc code and docs cleanupsI'm not confident enough to comment on patch 2, but these look reasonable to me.
Thanks. David has acked patch 2 already so I think we are good there.
quoted
- 3-8: mm,arm,arm64,powerpc,x86 prep: Replace pte_next_pfn() with more general pte_advance_pfn()These look fine to me.
Thanks!
quoted
- 9-18: arm64 prep: Refactor ptep helpers into new layerThe result of patches 9-17 looks good to me, but the intermediate stages where some functions are converted is a bit odd, and it's a bit painful for review since you need to skip ahead a few patches to see the end result to tell that the conversions are consistent and complete. IMO it'd be easier for review if that were three patches: 1) Convert READ_ONCE() -> ptep_get() 2) Convert set_pte_at() -> set_ptes() 3) All the "New layer" renames and addition of the trivial wrappers
Yep that makes sense. I'll start prepping that today. I'll hold off reposting until I have your comments on 19-25. I'm also hoping that David will repost the zap series today so that it can get into mm-unstable by mid-next week. Then I'll repost on top of that, hopefully by end of next week, folding in all your comments. This should give planty of time to soak in linux-next. Thanks, Ryan
Patch 18 looks fine to me.quoted
- 19: functional contpte implementation - 20-25: various optimizations on top of the contpte implementationI'll try to dig into these over the next few days. Mark.
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel