Re: [PATCH v2 24/25] KVM: arm64: Make FEAT_MOPS UNDEF if not advertised to the guest
From: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Date: 2024-01-31 15:02:49
Also in:
kvmarm
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:45:31PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
We unconditionally enable FEAT_MOPS, which is obviously wrong. So let's only do that when it is advertised to the guest. Which means we need to rely on a per-vcpu HCRX_EL2 shadow register. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 4 +--- arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 2 +- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 7 +++++++ 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h index 3c6f8ba1e479..a1769e415d72 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h@@ -102,9 +102,7 @@ #define HCR_HOST_NVHE_PROTECTED_FLAGS (HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS | HCR_TSC) #define HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS (HCR_RW | HCR_TGE | HCR_E2H) -#define HCRX_GUEST_FLAGS \ - (HCRX_EL2_SMPME | HCRX_EL2_TCR2En | \ - (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_MOPS) ? (HCRX_EL2_MSCEn | HCRX_EL2_MCE2) : 0)) +#define HCRX_GUEST_FLAGS (HCRX_EL2_SMPME | HCRX_EL2_TCR2En) #define HCRX_HOST_FLAGS (HCRX_EL2_MSCEn | HCRX_EL2_TCR2En) /* TCR_EL2 Registers bits */diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h index eff894d59590..50a122d42587 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h@@ -584,6 +584,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { /* Values of trap registers for the guest. */ u64 hcr_el2; + u64 hcrx_el2; u64 mdcr_el2; u64 cptr_el2;diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h index 2d5891518006..e3fcf8c4d5b4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static inline void __activate_traps_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) write_sysreg(vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2, mdcr_el2); if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCX)) { - u64 hcrx = HCRX_GUEST_FLAGS; + u64 hcrx = vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2; if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu) && !is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu)) { u64 clr = 0, set = 0;diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 38ed47bd29db..2cb69efac1dc 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c@@ -3956,6 +3956,13 @@ void kvm_init_sysreg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (!kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, TLB, OS)) vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 |= HCR_TTLBOS; + if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_HCX)) { + vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 = HCRX_GUEST_FLAGS; + + if (kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1, MOPS, IMP)) + vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 |= (HCRX_EL2_MSCEn | HCRX_EL2_MCE2); + } + if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_FGU_INITIALIZED, &kvm->arch.flags)) goto out;
Removed incorrect kern_hyp_va(). Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> Thanks, Joey _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel