Re: [PATCH 02/15] dt-bindings: clock: Add R8A779H0 V4M CPG Core Clock Definitions

quoted

For new bindings, or also for existing ones?
Doing the former means there are inconsistencies among different SoCs
in the same family.

For the new ones. It's just naming inconsistency which does not cause
any issues. Otherwise you never move to vendor,device.h format... which
is not that critical, but in the long term brings uniformity.

I haven't reviewed the patch itself, but for the naming scheme I'd
suggest to follow Krzysztof's suggestion. If he is OK with this level of
uniformity, then all is good, I'd say. Converting existing ones sounds
more messy to me.