Re: [PATCH 5/5] clk: samsung: gs101: don't mark non-essential clocks as critical
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Date: 2024-01-30 09:40:00
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 1/30/24 09:31, André Draszik wrote:
On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 13:16 -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote:quoted
That sounds reasonable. But I wonder if that bit (about making this clock CLK_IS_CRITICAL to make earlycon functional) can be documented somewhere. Perhaps in the serial driver (earlycon function), or somewhere in device tree bindings? Because otherwise it might remain an arcane knowledge and people won't be able to use earlycon later. Anyways, for this patch: Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> and if you think it makes sense to document the bit above, please do.Will do on top of https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240119104526.1221243-6-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org/ (local) once that is in.
It was applied, it's in linux-next. I like the dt bindings idea, it's the first thing I check when dealing with new hardware. No idea though how to add comments just for a specific compatible. Shall be a description somewhere... _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel