Re: [PATCH] perf print-events: make is_event_supported() more robust
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: 2024-01-24 15:48:49
Also in:
linux-perf-users, lkml
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 10:27:33AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:04 AM Mark Rutland [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Currently the perf tool doesn't deteect support for extneded event typesnit: s/deteect/detect/ nit: s/extneded/extended/
quoted
Thus is_event_supported() will fail to detect support for any events targetting an Apple M1/M2 PMU, even where events would be supported withnit: s/targetting/targeting/
quoted
This patch updates is_event_supported() to additionally try opening events with perf_event_attr::exclude_guest set, allowing support for events to be detected on Apple M1/M2 systems. I beleive that this isnit: s/beleive/believe/
Whoops; I've fixed those in my local tree now. [...]
quoted
Hector, Marc, I'd appreciate if either of you could give this a spin on your M1/M2 machines. I've given it local testing with the arm_pmuv3 driver modified to behave the same as the apple_m1_pmu driver (requiring exclude_guest, having a 'cycles' event in sysfs), but that might not perfectly replicate your setup. The patch is based on the 'perf-tools-for-v6.8-1-2024-01-09' tag in the perf-tools tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools.git/ ... and I've pushed it out to the 'perf-tools/event-supported-filters' branch in my tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/ This patch *should* make it possible to do: perf stat -e cycles ./workload perf stat -e instructions ./workload ... with those 'cycles' and 'instructions' events being automatically expanded and reported as separate events per-PMU, which is a nice quality-of-life improvement. Comparing before and after this patch: | # ./perf-before stat -e cycles true | | Performance counter stats for 'true': | | <not counted> cycles (0.00%) | | 0.000990250 seconds time elapsed | | 0.000934000 seconds user | 0.000000000 seconds sys | | # ./perf-after stat -e cycles true | | Performance counter stats for 'true': | | 965175 armv8_pmuv3_0/cycles/ | <not counted> armv8_pmuv3_1/cycles/ (0.00%) | <not counted> armv8_pmuv3_2/cycles/ (0.00%) | <not counted> armv8_pmuv3_3/cycles/ (0.00%) | | 0.000836555 seconds time elapsed | | 0.000884000 seconds user | 0.000000000 seconds sysJust to check, this is the expected expansion of cycles? I'm unclear why 4 core PMUs.
Yep; I had a fake big.LITTLE setup with four distinct microarchitectures (one per CPU), so the expansion above is expected. I had meant to explain that in the notes along with the other driver modifications, but I forgot, sorry!
quoted
This *shouldn't* change the interpetation of named-pmu events, e.g. perf stat -e apple_whichever_pmu/cycles/ ./workload ... should behave the same as without this patch Comparing before and after this patch: | # ./perf-before stat -e armv8_pmuv3_0/cycles/ -e armv8_pmuv3_1/cycles/ -e armv8_pmuv3_2/cycles/ -e armv8_pmuv3_3/cycles/ true | | Performance counter stats for 'true': | | <not counted> armv8_pmuv3_0/cycles/ (0.00%) | <not counted> armv8_pmuv3_1/cycles/ (0.00%) | <not counted> armv8_pmuv3_2/cycles/ (0.00%) | 901415 armv8_pmuv3_3/cycles/ | | 0.000756590 seconds time elapsed | | 0.000811000 seconds user | 0.000000000 seconds sys | | # ./perf-after stat -e armv8_pmuv3_0/cycles/ -e armv8_pmuv3_1/cycles/ -e armv8_pmuv3_2/cycles/ -e armv8_pmuv3_3/cycles/ true | | Performance counter stats for 'true': | | 923314 armv8_pmuv3_0/cycles/ | <not counted> armv8_pmuv3_1/cycles/ (0.00%) | <not counted> armv8_pmuv3_2/cycles/ (0.00%) | <not counted> armv8_pmuv3_3/cycles/ (0.00%) | | 0.000782420 seconds time elapsed | | 0.000836000 seconds user | 0.000000000 seconds sys One thing I'm still looing into is that this doesn't seem to do anything for a default perf stat session, e.g. perf stat ./workload ... doesn't automatically expand the implicitly-created events into per-pmu events.Ugh, weak symbols. x86 has overridden the default adding of attributes to do it for hybrid: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evlist.c?h=perf-tools-next#n36 I think we should lose the adding events via attributes and just go to using parse events for everything. I'll see if I can do some cleanup and that should resolve this - I also want to cleanup the default events/metrics and the detailed ones as we can drop the unsupported events, etc.
Ok; so IIUC we can treat that as a separate problem? I'm happy to test/review patches there.
quoted
Comparing before and after this patch: | # ./perf-before stat true | | Performance counter stats for 'true': | | 0.42 msec task-clock # 0.569 CPUs utilized | 0 context-switches # 0.000 /sec | 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 /sec | 38 page-faults # 89.796 K/sec | <not counted> cycles (0.00%) | <not counted> instructions (0.00%) | <not counted> branches (0.00%) | <not counted> branch-misses (0.00%) | | 0.000744185 seconds time elapsed | | 0.000795000 seconds user | 0.000000000 seconds sys | | # ./perf-after stat true | | Performance counter stats for 'true': | | 0.43 msec task-clock # 0.582 CPUs utilized | 0 context-switches # 0.000 /sec | 0 cpu-migrations # 0.000 /sec | 38 page-faults # 88.960 K/sec | <not counted> cycles (0.00%) | <not counted> instructions (0.00%) | <not counted> branches (0.00%) | <not counted> branch-misses (0.00%) | | 0.000734120 seconds time elapsed | | 0.000786000 seconds user | 0.000000000 seconds sys Ian, how does that behave on x86? Is that the same, or do the default events get expanded?The default events are expanded, the not counted is a feature of a fast binary (true here). I'm trying to remove custom code paths so that things like this don't happen, sorry that you've come across another instance but at least I can fix it.
Huh; I'm surprised that works with the named-pmu events, since that's the same 'true' binary. Is there anything I should go look at for that? Mark. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel