On 1/23/24 08:44, Tudor Ambarus wrote:

quoted

However I don't fully understand why that dependency - except patch hunk
context - exists. You shouldn't have such dependency.

Let me try offline, I'll get back to you.

The dropped patches depend on the dt-bindings patch that you queued
through the "next/drivers" branch:

b393a6c5e656 dt-bindings: clock: google,gs101-clock: add PERIC0 clock
management unit

We need the peric0 bindings that are referenced in device tree, that's
why the next/dt64 branch failed to build.

Please let me know if there's something on my side that I have to do
(now or in the future).

Thanks,
ta

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel