On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 19:43, Jeffrey Hugo [off-list ref] wrote:

On 1/22/2024 4:57 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:

quoted

The SoC line was never productized, remove the maintenance burden.

Compile-tested only.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <redacted>
---
Konrad Dybcio (2):
       pinctrl: qcom: Remove QDF2xxx support
       arm64: defconfig: Remove QDF24XX pinctrl

  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig           |   1 -
  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig.msm       |   7 --
  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Makefile          |   1 -
  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c | 164 ---------------------------------
  4 files changed, 173 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 319fbd8fc6d339e0a1c7b067eed870c518a13a02
change-id: 20240122-topic-qdf_cleanup_pinctrl-98e17cdb375b

Best regards,

NACK.

This was productized, there are some out in the wild, and the platform
is still in (limited) use.

I'd like to see support hang around for a few more years yet.

The problem is that... its support is pretty strange. I can see
pinctrl, ethernet and quirks for the platform in GIC-ITS and PL011
drivers. Is this enough to get the platform into the useful state? I
can imagine that "QCOM2430" ACPI handle was used for USB hosts on that
platform, but I don't remember when we last tested DWC3 with the ACPI.

So, all this boils down to the question whether mainline (or something
close by, LTS for example) is actually used and tested on these
devices?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel