Re: [PATCH 4/6] of: Create of_root if no dtb provided by firmware
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: 2024-01-17 01:18:18
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-kselftest, linux-patches, linux-um, lkml
Quoting Rob Herring (2024-01-15 12:32:30)
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:07:47PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig index da9826accb1b..9628e48baa15 100644 --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig@@ -54,9 +54,14 @@ config OF_FLATTREE select CRC32 config OF_EARLY_FLATTREE - bool + bool "Functions for accessing Flat Devicetree (FDT) early in boot"I think we could instead just get rid of this kconfig option. Or always enable with CONFIG_OF (except on Sparc). The only cost of enabling it is init section functions which get freed anyways.
Getting rid of it is a more massive change. It can be the default and kept hidden instead? If it can't be selected on Sparc then it should be hidden there anyway.
quoted
select DMA_DECLARE_COHERENT if HAS_DMA && HAS_IOMEM select OF_FLATTREE + help + Normally selected by platforms that process an FDT that has been + passed to the kernel by the bootloader. If the bootloader does not + pass an FDT to the kernel and you need an empty devicetree that + contains only a root node to exist, then say Y here. config OF_PROMTREE bool
[...]
quoted
@@ -195,6 +191,17 @@ static inline int of_node_check_flag(const struct device_node *n, unsigned long return test_bit(flag, &n->_flags); } +/** + * of_have_populated_dt() - Has DT been populated by bootloader + * + * Return: True if a DTB has been populated by the bootloader and it isn't the + * empty builtin one. False otherwise. + */ +static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void) +{ + return of_root != NULL && !of_node_check_flag(of_root, OF_EMPTY_ROOT);Just a side comment, but I think many/all callers of this function could just be removed. I don't love new flags. Another possible way to handle this would be checking for "compatible" being present in the root node. I guess this is fine as-is for now at least.
Ok. I can add a check for a compatible property. That's probably better anyway. Should there be a compatible property there to signal that this DT isn't compatible with anything? I worry about DT overlays injecting a compatible string into the root node, but maybe that is already prevented. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel