Re: [PATCH 3/5] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Convert to dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list()
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date: 2024-01-02 18:41:42
Also in:
linux-media, linux-pm, linux-remoteproc, lkml
Hi Ulf, I'm in agreement with the modifications done to imx_rproc.c and imx_dsp_rproc.c. There is one thing I am ambivalent on, please see below. On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 12:41:55PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Let's avoid the boilerplate code to manage the multiple PM domain case, by converting into using dev_pm_domain_attach|detach_list(). Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Cc: <redacted> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <redacted> --- drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 73 +++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 8bb293b9f327..3161f14442bc 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c@@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ struct imx_rproc_mem { static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc); static void imx_rproc_free_mbox(struct rproc *rproc); -static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc); struct imx_rproc { struct device *dev;@@ -113,10 +112,8 @@ struct imx_rproc { u32 rproc_pt; /* partition id */ u32 rsrc_id; /* resource id */ u32 entry; /* cpu start address */ - int num_pd; u32 core_index; - struct device **pd_dev; - struct device_link **pd_dev_link; + struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list; }; static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {@@ -853,7 +850,7 @@ static void imx_rproc_put_scu(struct rproc *rproc) return; if (imx_sc_rm_is_resource_owned(priv->ipc_handle, priv->rsrc_id)) { - imx_rproc_detach_pd(rproc); + dev_pm_domain_detach_list(priv->pd_list); return; }@@ -880,72 +877,20 @@ static int imx_rproc_partition_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, static int imx_rproc_attach_pd(struct imx_rproc *priv) { struct device *dev = priv->dev; - int ret, i; - - /* - * If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework - * will handle it, no need handle it in this driver. - */ - priv->num_pd = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "power-domains", - "#power-domain-cells"); - if (priv->num_pd <= 1) - return 0;
In function dev_pm_domain_attach_list(), this condition is "<= 0" rather than "<= 1". As such the association between the device and power domain will be done twice when there is a single power domain, i.e once by the core and once in dev_pm_domain_attach_list(). I am assuming the runtime PM subsystem is smart enough to deal with this kind of situation but would like a confirmation. Thanks, Mathieu
-
- priv->pd_dev = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!priv->pd_dev)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- priv->pd_dev_link = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, priv->num_pd, sizeof(*priv->pd_dev_link),
- GFP_KERNEL);
-
- if (!priv->pd_dev_link)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
- priv->pd_dev[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id(dev, i);
- if (IS_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i])) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(priv->pd_dev[i]);
- goto detach_pd;
- }
-
- priv->pd_dev_link[i] = device_link_add(dev, priv->pd_dev[i], DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
- DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
- if (!priv->pd_dev_link[i]) {
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto detach_pd;
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-
-detach_pd:
- while (--i >= 0) {
- device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-static int imx_rproc_detach_pd(struct rproc *rproc)
-{
- struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
- int i;
+ int ret;
+ struct dev_pm_domain_attach_data pd_data = {
+ .pd_flags = PD_FLAG_DEV_LINK_ON,
+ };
/*
* If there is only one power-domain entry, the platform driver framework
* will handle it, no need handle it in this driver.
*/
- if (priv->num_pd <= 1)
+ if (dev->pm_domain)
return 0;
- for (i = 0; i < priv->num_pd; i++) {
- device_link_del(priv->pd_dev_link[i]);
- dev_pm_domain_detach(priv->pd_dev[i], false);
- }
-
- return 0;
+ ret = dev_pm_domain_attach_list(dev, &pd_data, &priv->pd_list);
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
}
static int imx_rproc_detect_mode(struct imx_rproc *priv)
--
2.34.1_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel