Re: [PATCH] ARM: Delete ARM11MPCore perf leftovers
From: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Date: 2023-12-27 11:08:22
Also in:
linux-perf-users
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 11:24:38PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
My commit deleting the PB11MPCore apparently left a few dangling
structs in the perf event code. Fix it up.
Fixes: 2560cffd2134 ("ARM: Delete ARM11MPCore (ARM11 ARMv6K SMP) support")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <redacted>Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> Best regards, Liviu
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- This fixes a warning reported in the SoC tree, it's not even in next yet. Now that I turned on ARMv6 in my builds it is also tested. --- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c | 94 ----------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 94 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c index 3115077f6abc..0cbf46233d6b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c@@ -113,69 +113,6 @@ static const unsigned armv6_perf_cache_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX] [C(ITLB)][C(OP_WRITE)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV6_PERFCTR_ITLB_MISS, }; -enum armv6mpcore_perf_types { - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_ICACHE_MISS = 0x0, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_IBUF_STALL = 0x1, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DDEP_STALL = 0x2, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_ITLB_MISS = 0x3, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DTLB_MISS = 0x4, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_BR_EXEC = 0x5, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_BR_NOTPREDICT = 0x6, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_BR_MISPREDICT = 0x7, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_INSTR_EXEC = 0x8, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DCACHE_RDACCESS = 0xA, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DCACHE_RDMISS = 0xB, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DCACHE_WRACCESS = 0xC, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DCACHE_WRMISS = 0xD, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DCACHE_EVICTION = 0xE, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_SW_PC_CHANGE = 0xF, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_MAIN_TLB_MISS = 0x10, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_EXPL_MEM_ACCESS = 0x11, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_LSU_FULL_STALL = 0x12, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_WBUF_DRAINED = 0x13, - ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES = 0xFF, -}; - -/* - * The hardware events that we support. We do support cache operations but - * we have harvard caches and no way to combine instruction and data - * accesses/misses in hardware. - */ -static const unsigned armv6mpcore_perf_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX] = { - PERF_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED, - [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES, - [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_INSTR_EXEC, - [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_BR_EXEC, - [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_BR_MISPREDICT, - [PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_IBUF_STALL, - [PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_LSU_FULL_STALL, -}; - -static const unsigned armv6mpcore_perf_cache_map[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX] - [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX] - [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] = { - PERF_CACHE_MAP_ALL_UNSUPPORTED, - - [C(L1D)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DCACHE_RDACCESS, - [C(L1D)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DCACHE_RDMISS, - [C(L1D)][C(OP_WRITE)][C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DCACHE_WRACCESS, - [C(L1D)][C(OP_WRITE)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DCACHE_WRMISS, - - [C(L1I)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_ICACHE_MISS, - - /* - * The ARM performance counters can count micro DTLB misses, micro ITLB - * misses and main TLB misses. There isn't an event for TLB misses, so - * use the micro misses here and if users want the main TLB misses they - * can use a raw counter. - */ - [C(DTLB)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DTLB_MISS, - [C(DTLB)][C(OP_WRITE)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_DTLB_MISS, - - [C(ITLB)][C(OP_READ)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_ITLB_MISS, - [C(ITLB)][C(OP_WRITE)][C(RESULT_MISS)] = ARMV6MPCORE_PERFCTR_ITLB_MISS, -}; - static inline unsigned long armv6_pmcr_read(void) {@@ -452,37 +389,6 @@ static void armv6pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event) raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags); } -static void armv6mpcore_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event) -{ - unsigned long val, mask, flags, evt = 0; - struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu); - struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; - struct pmu_hw_events *events = this_cpu_ptr(cpu_pmu->hw_events); - int idx = hwc->idx; - - if (ARMV6_CYCLE_COUNTER == idx) { - mask = ARMV6_PMCR_CCOUNT_IEN; - } else if (ARMV6_COUNTER0 == idx) { - mask = ARMV6_PMCR_COUNT0_IEN; - } else if (ARMV6_COUNTER1 == idx) { - mask = ARMV6_PMCR_COUNT1_IEN; - } else { - WARN_ONCE(1, "invalid counter number (%d)\n", idx); - return; - } - - /* - * Unlike UP ARMv6, we don't have a way of stopping the counters. We - * simply disable the interrupt reporting. - */ - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags); - val = armv6_pmcr_read(); - val &= ~mask; - val |= evt; - armv6_pmcr_write(val); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags); -} - static int armv6_map_event(struct perf_event *event) { return armpmu_map_event(event, &armv6_perf_map,--- base-commit: b057e7afb79ec2edddc940b82af6e3571d1f0ffe change-id: 20231224-drop-11mpcore-fix-c6cb526d1296 Best regards, -- Linus Walleij [off-list ref]
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel