Re: [RFC PATCH 10/12] drm/amd/display: Use ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT
From: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com>
Date: 2023-12-14 03:21:25
Also in:
amd-gfx, linux-arch, linux-riscv, linuxppc-dev, lkml, loongarch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Samuel Holland" <samuel.holland@sifive.com> To: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "linux-kernel" <redacted>, "amd-gfx" <redacted>, "linux-arch" [off-list ref], "linux-arm-kernel" [off-list ref], loongarch@lists.linux.dev, "linuxppc-dev" [off-list ref], "x86" [off-list ref], linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, "Christoph Hellwig" [off-list ref], "Timothy Pearson" [off-list ref] Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 7:03:20 PM Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/12] drm/amd/display: Use ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT
On 2023-12-11 6:23 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:quoted
Hi Samuel, Thanks for trying to clean all this up. One problem below. Samuel Holland [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Now that all previously-supported architectures select ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT, this code can depend on that symbol instead of the existing list of architectures. It can also take advantage of the common kernel-mode FPU API and method of adjusting CFLAGS. Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>...quoted
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.cb/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c index 4ae4720535a5..b64f917174ca 100644--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c@@ -87,20 +78,9 @@ void dc_fpu_begin(const char *function_name, const int line) WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task()); preempt_disable(); depth = __this_cpu_inc_return(fpu_recursion_depth); - if (depth == 1) { -#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH) + BUG_ON(!kernel_fpu_available()); kernel_fpu_begin(); -#elif defined(CONFIG_PPC64) - if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP)) - enable_kernel_vsx(); - else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC_COMP)) - enable_kernel_altivec();Note altivec.quoted
- else if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE)) - enable_kernel_fp(); -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64) - kernel_neon_begin(); -#endif } TRACE_DCN_FPU(true, function_name, line, depth);diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefileb/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile index ea7d60f9a9b4..5aad0f572ba3 100644--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile@@ -25,40 +25,8 @@ # It provides the general basic services required by other DAL # subcomponents. -ifdef CONFIG_X86 -dml_ccflags-$(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) := -mhard-float -dml_ccflags := $(dml_ccflags-y) -msse -endif - -ifdef CONFIG_PPC64 -dml_ccflags := -mhard-float -maltivec -endifAnd altivec is enabled in the flags there. That doesn't match your implementation for powerpc in patch 7, which only deals with float. I suspect the AMD driver actually doesn't need altivec enabled, but I don't know that for sure. It compiles without it, but I don't have a GPU to actually test. I've added Timothy on Cc who added the support for powerpc to the driver originally, hopefully he has a test system.
If you would like me to test I'm happy to do so, but I am travelling until Friday so would need to wait until then. Thanks! _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel