On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:19:15AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 29/11/2023 08:29, Francesco Dolcini wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 07:44:22PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

---
+Following order of properties in device nodes is preferred:
+
+1. compatible
+2. reg
+3. ranges
+4. Standard/common properties (defined by common bindings, e.g. without
+   vendor-prefixes)

...

quoted

On point 4, do you have a more explicit way to define what is an actual
standard/common property? You mention the vendor-prefixes as an example,
is this just an example or this is the whole definition?

The actual definition is: defined by common bindings, which are:
meta-schemas and schemas in dtschema, and common bindings per subsystem
(e.g. leds/common.yaml).

Lack of vendor-prefix is I think 99% accurate in this matter, but there
are some "linux," ones.

Got it, thanks! I would suggest to incorporate in some way this additional
explanation in v4.

Francesco

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel