Thread (36 messages) read the whole thread 36 messages, 6 authors, 2023-11-30

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Document nuvoton ma35d1 pin control

From: Jacky Huang <hidden>
Date: 2023-11-28 09:32:52
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, lkml

Dear Krzysztof,

Thanks for your review.

On 2023/11/28 下午 04:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28/11/2023 09:29, Jacky Huang wrote:
quoted
Dear Krzysztof,

Thanks for your review.


On 2023/11/28 下午 03:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
On 28/11/2023 07:11, Jacky Huang wrote:
quoted
From: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@nuvoton.com>

Add documentation to describe nuvoton ma35d1 pin control and GPIO.

Signed-off-by: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@nuvoton.com>
---
Your changelog said:
quoted
    - Remove ma35d1-pinfunc.h which is unused after update definition of
'nuvoton,pins'.

You forgot to add:

" - Do not test the bindings before sending"

I assume none of the driver changes compile either.
It's my mistake. I forgot to remove 'ma35d1-pinfunc.h' from my local
copy, and as a consequence, the 'dt_binding_check' did not catch this
error. I will fix this.
But then git status would point you that tree is not clean and you did
not finish commiting.

..
Yes, I should have been more careful in checking.
quoted
quoted
quoted
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: pinctrl.yaml#
allOf goes before additionalProperties.
quoted
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - nuvoton,sys
This goes after patternProperties
I will fix the above two as:

allOf:
    - $ref: pinctrl.yaml#
Look:
quoted
quoted
allOf goes before additionalProperties.
Open example-schema.

..
I found that 'pinctrl.yaml' is not required for this document, so I will 
drop it.
quoted
quoted
quoted
+      - $ref: pincfg-node.yaml#
+
+    properties:
+      bias-disable: true
Drop this and other "true", why do you need them here?
We are following the conventions used in other pinctrl documents, such as
'realtek,rtd1315e-pinctrl.yaml' and 'xlnx,zynqmp-pinctrl.yaml'.
But they are quite different there.
quoted
After comparing various pinctrl documents, I noticed that they all express
it as 'bias-disable: true'. Therefore, may I keep the current format?
No, you cannot copy pieces of other binding, selectively ignoring the
rest. Look how these other bindings are constructed - they have
additionalProperties, which you don't.

Drop all these true properties if the only reason of them being here is
they were copied.



Best regards,
Krzysztof
OK, I will drop these properties.


Best Regards,
Jacky Huang


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help