RE: [PATCH 34/39] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs
From: Jianyong Wu <hidden>
Date: 2023-11-16 07:46:22
Also in:
kvmarm, linux-acpi, linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-pm, linux-riscv, lkml, loongarch
Hi Russell, One inline comment.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-----Original Message----- From: Russell King <redacted> On Behalf Of Russell King Sent: 2023年10月24日 23:19 To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; loongarch@lists.linux.dev; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-arch@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; kvmarm@lists.linux.dev; x86@kernel.org; linux-csky@vger.kernel.org; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org; linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Salil Mehta <redacted>; Jean-Philippe Brucker [off-list ref]; Jianyong Wu [off-list ref]; Justin He [off-list ref]; James Morse [off-list ref]; Catalin Marinas [off-list ref]; Will Deacon [off-list ref]; Mark Rutland [off-list ref]; Lorenzo Pieralisi [off-list ref] Subject: [PATCH 34/39] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted> When a CPU is marked as disabled, but online capable in the MADT, PSCI applies some firmware policy to control when it can be brought online. PSCI returns DENIED to a CPU_ON request if this is not currently permitted. The OS can learn the current policy from the _STA enabled bit. Handle the PSCI DENIED return code gracefully instead of printing an error. See https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0022/f/?lang=en page 58. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <redacted> [ morse: Rewrote commit message ] Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <redacted> --- Changes since RFC v2 * Add specification reference * Use EPERM rather than EPROBE_DEFER --- arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 3 ++- drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c index29a8e444db83..4fcc0cdd757b 100644--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu) { phys_addr_t pa_secondary_entry = __pa_symbol(secondary_entry); int err = psci_ops.cpu_on(cpu_logical_map(cpu), pa_secondary_entry); - if (err) + if (err && err != -EPROBE_DEFER)
Should this be EPERM? As the following psci cpu_on op will return it. I think you miss to change this when apply Jean-Philippe's patch. Thanks Jianyong
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
pr_err("failed to boot CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu, err); return err;diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c index8c8f55721786..68ec7fbe166f 100644--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c@@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) /* Now bring the CPU into our world */ ret = boot_secondary(cpu, idle); if (ret) { - pr_err("CPU%u: failed to boot: %d\n", cpu, ret); + if (ret != -EPERM) + pr_err("CPU%u: failed to boot: %d\n", cpu, ret); return ret; }diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c indexd9629ff87861..ee82e7880d8c 100644--- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c@@ -218,6 +218,8 @@ static int __psci_cpu_on(u32 fn, unsigned long cpuid,unsigned long entry_point) int err; err = invoke_psci_fn(fn, cpuid, entry_point, 0); + if (err == PSCI_RET_DENIED) + return -EPERM; return psci_to_linux_errno(err); } -- 2.30.2
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel