On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 3:32 PM Alexander Lobakin
[off-list ref] wrote:

From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:28:56 +0100

quoted

quoted

Could we maybe rather extend __check_eq_uint to take ulongs? Doesn't
seem like they differ a lot.

We could redefine expect_eq_uint as:

#define expect_eq_uint(x, y)           expect_eq_ulong((unsigned
int)(x), (unsigned int)(y))

Do we need explicit casts here tho?

We do.
test_bitmap_arr64() passes u64 values to expect_eq_uint(), which
results in test failures.
We could add an explicit cast there instead, but I think it's more
natural to let the users rely on expect_eq_uint() taking uints.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel