On 09/11/2023 07:28, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 06:47:46PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
quoted
Add samsung,exynosautov920-pwm compatible string to binding document.
Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <redacted>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
index 2162f661ed5a..b6beca2ae81e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ properties:
- items:
- enum:
- samsung,exynosautov9-pwm
+ - samsung,exynosautov920-pwm
- const: samsung,exynos4210-pwm
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>
What is the merge plan here? Should this go via the pwm tree, or can it
better go via some exynos tree together with the dts files?
I propose I will take it. I will have conflicting change and keeping
bindings with DTS together allows smooth dtbs_check.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel