Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2023-11-07

Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] arm64/amu: Use capacity_ref_freq to set AMU ratio

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-11-07 10:38:22
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-pm, linux-riscv, lkml

On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 11:59:07AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Use the new capacity_ref_freq to set the ratio that is used by AMU for
computing the arch_scale_freq_capacity().
This helps to keep everything aligned using the same reference for
computing CPUs capacity.

The default value of the ratio (stored in per_cpu(arch_max_freq_scale))
ensures that arch_scale_freq_capacity() returns max capacity until it is
set to its correct value with the cpu capacity and capacity_ref_freq.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c  | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 drivers/base/arch_topology.c  | 12 +++++++++++-
 include/linux/arch_topology.h |  1 +
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index 817d788cd866..615c1a20129f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -82,7 +82,12 @@ int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
 #undef pr_fmt
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) "AMU: " fmt
 
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, arch_max_freq_scale);
+/*
+ * Ensure that amu_scale_freq_tick() will return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE until
+ * the CPU capacity and its associated frequency have been correctly
+ * initialized.
+ */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, arch_max_freq_scale) =  1UL << (2 * SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT);
This doesn't seem to match the comment? SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE doesn't have
the '2 *' multiplier.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, arch_const_cycles_prev);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, arch_core_cycles_prev);
 static cpumask_var_t amu_fie_cpus;
@@ -112,14 +117,14 @@ static inline bool freq_counters_valid(int cpu)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static int freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate, u64 ref_rate)
+void freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate)
 {
-	u64 ratio;
+	u64 ratio, ref_rate = arch_timer_get_rate();
 
 	if (unlikely(!max_rate || !ref_rate)) {
-		pr_debug("CPU%d: invalid maximum or reference frequency.\n",
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "CPU%d: invalid maximum or reference frequency.\n",
 			 cpu);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -139,12 +144,12 @@ static int freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate, u64 ref_rate)
 	ratio = div64_u64(ratio, max_rate);
 	if (!ratio) {
 		WARN_ONCE(1, "Reference frequency too low.\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
+		return;
 	}
 
-	per_cpu(arch_max_freq_scale, cpu) = (unsigned long)ratio;
+	WRITE_ONCE(per_cpu(arch_max_freq_scale, cpu), (unsigned long)ratio);
Why is WRITE_ONCE() now needed?
-	return 0;
+	return;
Pointless 'return;' statement.

Will

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help