Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: boot: Support Flat Image Tree
From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2023-10-31 11:46:12
Also in:
linux-kbuild, lkml, u-boot
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 04:03:18PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 1:12 AM Tom Rini [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 03:35:34PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:quoted
On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 05:46:12AM +1300, Simon Glass wrote:quoted
Hi Masahiro, Sure, but that is a separate issue, isn't it? We already support various boot targets in arm64 but not one that includes the DTs, so far as I can see. The old arm 'uImage' target is pretty out-of-date now.Does that mean it can be removed? ;) I've NAK'd FIT support on 32-bit Arm in the past, and I remain of the opinion that boot loader specific packaging of the kernel should not be in the kernel but should be external to it - even more so given the multi-platform nature of 32-bit Arm kernels.I'll point it out here rather than Simon. As part of https://github.com/open-source-firmware FIT is a standard and not "boot loader specific". And one of the points of a FIT image is that you can easily support multi-platform kernels in a single file (without optimizing things further, at a cost in tens of milliseconds on a Pi 3 anyhow) and with user-controlled security. -- TomIt is a copy of the document in U-Boot. The file was split into two, but the content is the same. [original in U-Boot] https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/blob/v2023.10/doc/usage/fit/source_file_format.rst [flat-image-tree] https://github.com/open-source-firmware/flat-image-tree/blob/v0.8/source/chapter1-introduction.rst https://github.com/open-source-firmware/flat-image-tree/blob/v0.8/source/chapter2-source-file-format.rst
Yes, it would have been a bad idea to change a 15 year old format as part of getting it included in some standards, and we'd also recently cleaned it up to rST. Similar comments would I expect be true of turning grub.cfg in to extlinux.conf and all of the organizations that has moved along, and anything else that wasn't developed by committee at some Standards organization. -- Tom _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel