Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 4 authors, 2023-09-27

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] arm64: mte: implement CONFIG_ARM64_MTE_COMP

From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Date: 2023-09-22 08:05:32
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 1:22 PM Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:39:54PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
quoted
The config implements the algorithm compressing memory tags for ARM MTE
during swapping.

The algorithm is based on RLE and specifically targets 128-byte buffers
of tags corresponding to a single page. In the common case a buffer
can be compressed into 63 bits, making it possible to store it without
additional memory allocation.
...
quoted
+Programming Interface
+=====================
+
+ .. kernel-doc:: arch/arm64/mm/mtecomp.c
:export:
Done
quoted
+
Is it dangling trailing blank line? Drop it.
Sorry, it's hard to attribute this comment. I am assuming it is
related to Documentation/arch/arm64/mte-tag-compression.rst - done.
...
quoted
+#include <linux/bitmap.h>
quoted
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
This is guaranteed to be included by bitmap.h.
I think we'd better stick to IWYU here.
Ingo's patch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/tip.git/commit/?id=32b1e9e4f5774951a3a80604a39fa1f0674c1833
specifically adds bitmap.h where bits.h is already present, without
removing the latter.
Although there might not be general consensus on this in the kernel
right now, I think Ingo's "Fast Kernel Headers" set out a good
direction.
quoted
+/*
+ * Sizes of compressed values. These depend on MTE_TAG_SIZE and
of the
This comment is gone now
quoted
+     out_tags[0] = prev_tag;
out_tags[cur_idx] ?
Yeah, looks more readable. Done.
quoted
+     for (i = 0; i < MTE_PAGE_TAG_STORAGE; i++) {
+             for (j = 0; j < 2; j++) {
+                     cur_tag = j ? (tags[i] % 16) : (tags[i] / 16);
+                     if (cur_tag == prev_tag) {
+                             out_sizes[cur_idx]++;
quoted
+                     } else {
+                             cur_idx++;
+                             prev_tag = cur_tag;
+                             out_tags[cur_idx] = prev_tag;
+                             out_sizes[cur_idx] = 1;
Looking more at this I think there is still a room for improvement. I can't
come up right now with a proposal (lunch time :-), but I would look into

        do {
                ...
        } while (i < MTE_...);

approach.
We can e.g. get rid of the nested loop and iterate over tags instead
of bytes (see v5)

quoted
+static size_t mte_size_to_ranges(size_t size)
+{
+     size_t largest_bits;
quoted
+     size_t ret = 0;
Redundant assignment. Please, check again all of them.
Done.
quoted
+
+     largest_bits = (size == 8) ? MTE_BITS_PER_LARGEST_IDX_INLINE :
+                                  MTE_BITS_PER_LARGEST_IDX;
+     ret = (size * 8 + MTE_BITS_PER_SIZE - largest_bits) /
Hmm... I thought that we moved BYTES_TO_BITS() to the generic header...
Okay, never mind.
Ack
quoted
+           (MTE_BITS_PER_TAG + MTE_BITS_PER_SIZE);
+     return ret;
        return (...) / ...;
Done
quoted
+}
...
quoted
+static size_t mte_alloc_size(unsigned int num_ranges)
+{
+     size_t sizes[4] = { 8, 16, 32, 64 };
Hooray! And now it's not needed anymore...
quoted
+     unsigned int i;
+
+     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sizes); i++) {
...as sizes[i] is equivalent of (8 << i).
It's gone now.
...
quoted
+/**
+ * mte_compress() - compress the given tag array.
+ * @tags: 128-byte array to read the tags from.
+ *
+ * Compresses the tags and returns a 64-bit opaque handle pointing to the
+ * tag storage. May allocate memory, which is freed by @mte_release_handle().
+ blank line here.
Done (here and in other places in the file), but I'm wondering why
https://docs.kernel.org/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html does not mandate it.
quoted
+ * Returns: 64-bit tag storage handle.
+ */
...
quoted
+     /*
+      * mte_compress_to_buf() only initializes the bits that mte_decompress()
+      * will read. But when the tags are stored in the handle itself, it must
+      * have all its bits initialized.
+      */
+     unsigned long result = 0;
        // Actually it's interesting how it's supposed to work on 32-bit
        // builds...
It is not supposed to work on 32 bit.
First, the code is in arch/arm64 :)
Second, 32-bit CPUs do not support MTE (which reserves the four upper
bits of the address)

quoted
+static unsigned long mte_bitmap_read(const unsigned long *bitmap,
+                                  unsigned long *pos, unsigned long bits)
+{
+     unsigned long result;
+
+     result = bitmap_read(bitmap, *pos, bits);
+     *pos += bits;
+     return result;
        unsigned long start = *pos;

        *pos += bits;
        return bitmap_read(bitmap, start, bits);
Done, thanks!
quoted
+}
...
quoted
+     unsigned short r_sizes[46], sum = 0;
See below.

...

It's cleaner and more robust to have

        sum = 0;

here.
Moved it inside the loop init statement

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Thank you!

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help