Re: [PATCH 10/26] KVM: s390: Stop selecting and depending on HAVE_KVM
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2023-09-18 15:22:56
Also in:
kvm, kvm-riscv, kvmarm, linux-mips, linux-perf-users, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linuxppc-dev, lkml
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:31:02 -0700 Sean Christopherson [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Now that nothing in s390 or architecture agnostic code consumes HAVE_KVM, stop selecting it in s390. This is one of several steps towards deleting HAVE_KVM from the common KVM Kconfig. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> --- arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 - arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig | 1 - 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig index ae29e4392664..8a5dca0036d9 100644 --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig@@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ config S390 select HAVE_KPROBES select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE select HAVE_KRETPROBES - select HAVE_KVM select HAVE_LIVEPATCH select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFICdiff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig index 459d536116a6..9056cee72945 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/Kconfig@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ if VIRTUALIZATION config KVM def_tristate y prompt "Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) support" - depends on HAVE_KVM select PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS select HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT select HAVE_KVM_VCPU_ASYNC_IOCTL
it looks like we don't use HAVE_KVM on s390x Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel