Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add compatible for SM4450 SoC
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2023-09-15 09:11:41
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, lkml
On 15/09/2023 09:15, Tengfei Fan wrote:
在 9/15/2023 3:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:quoted
On 15/09/2023 04:15, Tengfei Fan wrote:quoted
Add the SoC specific compatible for SM4450 implementing arm,mmu-500. Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml index cf29ab10501c..b57751c8ad90 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ properties: - qcom,sdx55-smmu-500 - qcom,sdx65-smmu-500 - qcom,sdx75-smmu-500 + - qcom,sm4450-smmu-500 - qcom,sm6115-smmu-500 - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500 - qcom,sm6350-smmu-500@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ properties: - qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500 - qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500 - qcom,sdm845-smmu-500 + - qcom,sm4450-smmu-500Isn't there comment just few lines above your edit? Comment saying DON'T?yes, I saw this "DON'T" comment, but if I remove "qcom,sm4450-smmu-500" from sm4450.dtsi and this arm,smmu.yaml, will get DT check warning about
Why would you remove it?
this, this warning cannot be find after add "qcom,sm4450-smmu-500" from sm4450.dtsi and this arm,smmu.yaml, so update this patch again.
What does the comment say? Why are you adding it to the enum which asks - do not add to this enum, but add to other above and below? Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel