Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 6 authors, 2023-08-27

Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add add-maintainer.py script

From: Guru Das Srinagesh <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-19 01:34:41
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-pm, lkml

On Aug 18 2023 10:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
quoted
For newcomers, OTOH, I would either recommend simple workflow or just
use b4. Why? Because if you cannot use git-send-email, then it means
your email setup will make your life difficult and adding maintainers to
existing patch won't help you.
You've mentioned a "simple workflow" many times - could you please share more
details on the steps you follow in your workflow for sending patches?
I shared it on LKML few times already (and Rob's git send-email identity
is also on LKML), so one more time:

https://github.com/krzk/tools/blob/master/linux/.bash_aliases_linux#L91
Thank you for sharing this - it is really neat indeed and you certainly don't
need a step #2 with this method.

However, I see areas for improvement in the alias:
- Subsystem-specific mailing lists, maintainers, reviewers, and other roles are
  all marked as "To: " sans distinction via the alias whereas
  `add-maintainer.py` and `b4` both provide marking of lists as "Cc: " which
  seems aesthetically and semantically more pleasing.
- Only `add-maintainer.py` allows for maintainers to be selectively in "To: "
  and "Cc: " for patches in a series depending on whether they are the
  maintainers for that particular patch or not.
quoted
quoted
This tool depends on the command line and shell interface of
scripts/get_maintainers.pl which is another reason why it might not be a
good idea.
Could you please elaborate on why depending on the output of
`get_maintainer.pl` is a bad idea? It's what everyone uses, no?
No, because if interface changes you need to update two tools.
But `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` also uses `get_maintainer.pl`!

Also, in your previous email you said to "just use b4", which also depends on
the command line and shell interface of `get_maintainers.pl`. Depending on
`get_maintainer.pl` is therefore perfectly okay - there is no need to reinvent
it or disregard it for whatever reasons.

Thank you.

Guru Das.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help