Re: [PATCH v6 5/7] perf test: Add pmu-event test for "Compat" and new event_field.
From: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2023-08-15 12:34:42
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-perf-users, lkml
在 2023/8/15 上午9:11, Ian Rogers 写道:
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 12:51 AM Jing Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Add new event test for uncore system event which is used to verify the functionality of "Compat" matching multiple identifiers and the new event fields "EventIdCode" and "Type". Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>Did you test with NO_JEVENTS=1?
You are absolutely right. I completely overlooked the case where NO_JEVENTS=1.
quoted
--- .../pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/sys/uncore.json | 8 ++++ tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/sys/uncore.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/sys/uncore.json index c7e7528..19ec595 100644 --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/sys/uncore.json +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/test/test_soc/sys/uncore.json@@ -12,5 +12,13 @@ "EventName": "sys_ccn_pmu.read_cycles", "Unit": "sys_ccn_pmu", "Compat": "0x01" + }, + { + "BriefDescription": "Counts total cache misses in first lookup result (high priority).", + "Type": "0x05", + "EventIdCode": "0x01", + "EventName": "sys_cmn_pmu.hnf_cache_miss", + "Unit": "sys_cmn_pmu", + "Compat": "434*;436*;43c*;43a01"I suspect this needs adding here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/pmu-events/empty-pmu-events.c?h=perf-tools-next#n247
After adding the relevant code in empty-pmu-events.c, it can successfully test with NO_JEVENTS=1. Thanks, Jing
Thanks, Ianquoted
} ]diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c index 3204252..79fb3e2 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c@@ -255,9 +255,24 @@ struct perf_pmu_test_pmu { .matching_pmu = "uncore_sys_ccn_pmu4", }; +static const struct perf_pmu_test_event sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss = { + .event = { + .name = "sys_cmn_pmu.hnf_cache_miss", + .event = "type=0x05,eventid=0x01", + .desc = "Counts total cache misses in first lookup result (high priority). Unit: uncore_sys_cmn_pmu ", + .topic = "uncore", + .pmu = "uncore_sys_cmn_pmu", + .compat = "434*;436*;43c*;43a01", + }, + .alias_str = "type=0x5,eventid=0x1", + .alias_long_desc = "Counts total cache misses in first lookup result (high priority). Unit: uncore_sys_cmn_pmu ", + .matching_pmu = "uncore_sys_cmn_pmu0", +}; + static const struct perf_pmu_test_event *sys_events[] = { &sys_ddr_pmu_write_cycles, &sys_ccn_pmu_read_cycles, + &sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss, NULL };@@ -704,6 +719,46 @@ static int __test_uncore_pmu_event_aliases(struct perf_pmu_test_pmu *test_pmu) &sys_ccn_pmu_read_cycles, }, }, + { + .pmu = { + .name = (char *)"uncore_sys_cmn_pmu0", + .is_uncore = 1, + .id = (char *)"43401", + }, + .aliases = { + &sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss, + }, + }, + { + .pmu = { + .name = (char *)"uncore_sys_cmn_pmu0", + .is_uncore = 1, + .id = (char *)"43602", + }, + .aliases = { + &sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss, + }, + }, + { + .pmu = { + .name = (char *)"uncore_sys_cmn_pmu0", + .is_uncore = 1, + .id = (char *)"43c03", + }, + .aliases = { + &sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss, + }, + }, + { + .pmu = { + .name = (char *)"uncore_sys_cmn_pmu0", + .is_uncore = 1, + .id = (char *)"43a01", + }, + .aliases = { + &sys_cmn_pmu_hnf_cache_miss, + }, + } }; /* Test that aliases generated are as expected */ --1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel