Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2023-08-14

Re: [PATCH] perf/smmuv3: Enable HiSilicon Erratum 162001900 quirk for HIP08/09

From: Yicong Yang <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-14 08:54:43
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-doc, lkml

On 2023/8/11 19:17, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 06:06:54PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c
index 25a269d431e4..b854b67b81fc 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@
 #define SMMU_PMCG_PA_SHIFT              12
 
 #define SMMU_PMCG_EVCNTR_RDONLY         BIT(0)
+#define SMMU_PMCG_HARDEN_DISABLE        BIT(1)
 
 static int cpuhp_state_num;
 
@@ -150,6 +151,22 @@ SMMU_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_EXTRACTOR(filter_stream_id, config1, 0, 31);
 SMMU_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_EXTRACTOR(filter_span, config1, 32, 32);
 SMMU_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_EXTRACTOR(filter_enable, config1, 33, 33);
 
+static int smmu_pmu_apply_event_filter(struct smmu_pmu *smmu_pmu,
+				       struct perf_event *event, int idx);
+
+static inline void smmu_pmu_enable_quirk_hip08_09(struct pmu *pmu)
+{
+	struct smmu_pmu *smmu_pmu = to_smmu_pmu(pmu);
+	unsigned int idx;
+
+	for_each_set_bit(idx, smmu_pmu->used_counters, smmu_pmu->num_counters)
+		smmu_pmu_apply_event_filter(smmu_pmu, smmu_pmu->events[idx], idx);
+
+	writel(SMMU_PMCG_IRQ_CTRL_IRQEN,
+	       smmu_pmu->reg_base + SMMU_PMCG_IRQ_CTRL);
+	writel(SMMU_PMCG_CR_ENABLE, smmu_pmu->reg_base + SMMU_PMCG_CR);
Can you tail-call smmu_pmu_enable() instead of duplicating it here?
quoted
+static inline void smmu_pmu_disable_quirk_hip08_09(struct pmu *pmu)
+{
+	struct smmu_pmu *smmu_pmu = to_smmu_pmu(pmu);
+	unsigned int idx;
+
+	/*
+	 * The global disable of PMU sometimes fail to stop the counting.
+	 * Harden this by writing an invalid event type to each used counter
+	 * to forcibly stop counting.
+	 */
+	for_each_set_bit(idx, smmu_pmu->used_counters, smmu_pmu->num_counters)
+		writel(0xffff, smmu_pmu->reg_base + SMMU_PMCG_EVTYPER(idx));
+
+	writel(0, smmu_pmu->reg_base + SMMU_PMCG_CR);
+	writel(0, smmu_pmu->reg_base + SMMU_PMCG_IRQ_CTRL);
Same things here, but with smmu_pmu_disable()
Sure. Will tail call smmu_pmu_{enable, disable} in both case to avoid duplication.
Thanks for the comments.

Thanks.


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help