On 01/08/2023 10:25, Maso Huang (黃加竹) wrote:
On Fri, 2023-07-28 at 14:51 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
you have verified the sender or the content.
On 28/07/2023 11:08, Maso Huang wrote:
quoted
Add mt7986 audio afe document.
Signed-off-by: Maso Huang <redacted>
Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
quoted
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - interrupts
+ - clocks
+ - clock-names
+ - assigned-clocks
+ - assigned-clock-parents
You should constrain your clocks per variants. I doubt that they are
really so flexible/optional on each SoC... or maybe missing clocks
are
result of unimplemented parts in the driver? But then this should not
really affect bindings. Bindings still should require such clocks.
Your
DTS can always provide a <0>, if needed.
Hi Krzysztof,
After internal check, assigned-clocks and assigned-clock-parents are
not required on this SoC.
Maybe we can just drop these two options?
It's separate issue, but yes - why requiring them?
I wrote about missing constraints for your clocks in the bindings.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel