Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 5 authors, 2023-07-22

Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] virt: geniezone: Add GenieZone hypervisor support

From: Yi-De Wu (吳一德) <hidden>
Date: 2023-07-21 08:46:44
Also in: linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mediatek, lkml

On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 17:22 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
 	 
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
you have verified the sender or the content.
 On 09/06/2023 10:52, Yi-De Wu wrote:
quoted
From: "Yingshiuan Pan" <redacted>

GenieZone is MediaTek hypervisor solution, and it is running in EL2
stand alone as a type-I hypervisor. This patch exports a set of
ioctl
quoted
interfaces for userspace VMM (e.g., crosvm) to operate guest VMs
lifecycle (creation and destroy) on GenieZone.
...
quoted
+static int gzvm_drv_probe(void)
+{
+int ret;
+
+if (gzvm_arch_probe() != 0) {
+pr_err("Not found available conduit\n");
+return -ENODEV;
+}
+
+ret = misc_register(&gzvm_dev);
+if (ret)
+return ret;
+gzvm_debug_dev = &gzvm_dev;
+
+return 0;
+}
+
+static int gzvm_drv_remove(void)
+{
+destroy_all_vm();
+misc_deregister(&gzvm_dev);
+return 0;
+}
+
+static int gzvm_dev_init(void)
+{
+return gzvm_drv_probe();
So for every system and architecture you want to: probe, run some SMC
and then print error that it is not othe system you wanted.

I don't think this is what we want. You basically pollute all of
other
users just to have your hypervisor guest additions...


Best regards,
Krzysztof

hi Krzysztof,

After some back-and-forth discussion[1][2][3][4][5], we'd like to bring
bakc all the attension of related issues in this thread.

We're going to restore the dt solution on our next version, which means
we would maintain a simple dt for discovering the hypervisor node and
probe for the status of the device when needed.

The reasons are listed below for the record.
- Although dt is for hardware, it's difficult to discover a specific
hypervisor without probing on all subsystem and thus pollute all of
other users[4] as a consequence.
- The GenieZone hypervisor could be considered as a vendor model to
assist platform virtualization whose implementation is independent from
Linuxism.

Please let us if there're any other concerns.

Reference

[1] 
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/2447547/comment/495502f3_bb52344b/
[2] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230428212411.GA292303-robh@kernel.org/ (local)
[3] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ec4cae2e6da4a64bc3983ffdde03f51e185d3609.camel@mediatek.com/ (local)
[4] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2fe0c7f9-55fc-ae63-3631-8526a0212ccd@linaro.org/ (local)
[5] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/14c0381be38ea40fcd03104bff32bcaa09b920d3.camel@mediatek.com/ (local)


Regards,
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help