Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] virt: geniezone: Add GenieZone hypervisor support
From: Yi-De Wu (吳一德) <hidden>
Date: 2023-07-21 08:46:44
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 17:22 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. On 09/06/2023 10:52, Yi-De Wu wrote:quoted
From: "Yingshiuan Pan" <redacted> GenieZone is MediaTek hypervisor solution, and it is running in EL2 stand alone as a type-I hypervisor. This patch exports a set ofioctlquoted
interfaces for userspace VMM (e.g., crosvm) to operate guest VMs lifecycle (creation and destroy) on GenieZone....quoted
+static int gzvm_drv_probe(void) +{ +int ret; + +if (gzvm_arch_probe() != 0) { +pr_err("Not found available conduit\n"); +return -ENODEV; +} + +ret = misc_register(&gzvm_dev); +if (ret) +return ret; +gzvm_debug_dev = &gzvm_dev; + +return 0; +} + +static int gzvm_drv_remove(void) +{ +destroy_all_vm(); +misc_deregister(&gzvm_dev); +return 0; +} + +static int gzvm_dev_init(void) +{ +return gzvm_drv_probe();So for every system and architecture you want to: probe, run some SMC and then print error that it is not othe system you wanted. I don't think this is what we want. You basically pollute all of other users just to have your hypervisor guest additions... Best regards, Krzysztof
hi Krzysztof, After some back-and-forth discussion[1][2][3][4][5], we'd like to bring bakc all the attension of related issues in this thread. We're going to restore the dt solution on our next version, which means we would maintain a simple dt for discovering the hypervisor node and probe for the status of the device when needed. The reasons are listed below for the record. - Although dt is for hardware, it's difficult to discover a specific hypervisor without probing on all subsystem and thus pollute all of other users[4] as a consequence. - The GenieZone hypervisor could be considered as a vendor model to assist platform virtualization whose implementation is independent from Linuxism. Please let us if there're any other concerns. Reference [1] https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/2447547/comment/495502f3_bb52344b/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230428212411.GA292303-robh@kernel.org/ (local) [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ec4cae2e6da4a64bc3983ffdde03f51e185d3609.camel@mediatek.com/ (local) [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2fe0c7f9-55fc-ae63-3631-8526a0212ccd@linaro.org/ (local) [5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/14c0381be38ea40fcd03104bff32bcaa09b920d3.camel@mediatek.com/ (local) Regards,
_______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel