On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:00:59AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:

The 07/13/2023 15:18, Vladimir Oltean wrote:

Hi Vladimir,

quoted

Based on previous RFCs from Maxim Georgiev:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230502043150.17097-1-glipus@gmail.com/ (local)

this series attempts to introduce new API for the hardware timestamping
control path (SIOCGHWTSTAMP and SIOCSHWTSTAMP handling).

I don't have any board with phylib hardware timestamping, so I would
appreciate testing (especially on lan966x, the most intricate
conversion). I was, however, able to test netdev level timestamping,
because I also have some more unsubmitted conversions in progress:

https://github.com/vladimiroltean/linux/commits/ndo-hwtstamp-v7

I have tested this patch series on lan966x. In both cases, when there is
a PHY that supports HW timestamping and when the isn't a PHY that
supports HW timestamping. In both cases it behaves as expected. Thanks!
Tested-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>

Thanks for testing! I'll apply this tag to patches:

net: add NDOs for configuring hardware timestamping
net: lan966x: convert to ndo_hwtstamp_get() and ndo_hwtstamp_set()
net: remove phy_has_hwtstamp() -> phy_mii_ioctl() decision from converted drivers

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel