Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] Update ACPI documentation for Arm systems

Hi,

On 6/6/23 04:35, Jose Marinho wrote:

This set of patches updates the Linux kernel ACPI documentation for Arm
systems. The intent is to integrate the developments in the BBR
specification that happened over the last couple of years.

Thanks for doing this, it has been sorely needed. The changes all look 
good to me too, so:

Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <redacted>


Now all that said, at some point it will be worthwhile to reopen the 
discussion around a few of the more "controversial" parts of this 
document so they better reflect the current state of machines utilizing 
ACPI.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Jeremy Linton <redacted>
Cc: James Morse <James.Morse@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <redacted>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

v2:
  - Clarify that the RAS tables are conditionaly required when ACPI
    Platform Error Interfaces are required: Hanjun Guo.
  - Clarify that HMAT is required if NUMA is supported and the system
    contains heterogeneous memory: Hanjun Guo.


Jose Marinho (3):
   Documentation/arm64: Update ARM and arch reference
   Documentation/arm64: Update references in arm-acpi
   Documentation/arm64: Update ACPI tables from BBR

  Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.rst |  81 ++++++++++-
  Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.rst          | 168 ++++++++++++++--------
  2 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel