Allright, I'll resend the series along with David's patches.

Thank you.
Raghavendra

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 7:14 AM Sean Christopherson [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023, Oliver Upton wrote:

quoted

+cc Sean

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 06:57:01PM -0700, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 5:19 AM Oliver Upton [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi Raghavendra,

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:28:51PM +0000, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:

quoted

The series is based off of upstream v6.4-rc2, and applied David
Matlack's common API for TLB invalidations[1] on top.

Sorry I didn't spot the dependency earlier, but this isn't helpful TBH.

David's series was partially applied, and what remains no longer cleanly
applies to the base you suggest. Independent of that, my *strong*
preference is that you just send out a series containing your patches as
well as David's. Coordinating dependent efforts is the only sane thing
to do. Also, those patches are 5 months old at this point which is
ancient history.

Would you rather prefer I detach this series from David's as I'm not
sure what his plans are for future versions?
On the other hand, the patches seem simple enough to rebase and give
another shot at review, but may end up delaying this series.
WDYT?

In cases such as this you'd typically coordinate with the other
developer to pick up their changes as part of your series. Especially
for this case -- David's refactoring is _pointless_ without another
user for that code (i.e. arm64). As fun as it might be to antagonize
Sean, that series pokes x86 and I'd like an ack from on it.

So, please post a combined series that applies cleanly to an early 6.4
rc of your choosing, and cc all affected reviewers/maintainers.

+1

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel