Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 5 authors, 2023-06-22
STALE1124d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)
Revisions (18)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 [diff vs current]
  5. v5 [diff vs current]
  6. v6 [diff vs current]
  7. v7 [diff vs current]
  8. v8 [diff vs current]
  9. v9 [diff vs current]
  10. v10 [diff vs current]
  11. v11 [diff vs current]
  12. v12 current
  13. v13 [diff vs current]
  14. v13 [diff vs current]
  15. v15 [diff vs current]
  16. v16 [diff vs current]
  17. v17 [diff vs current]
  18. v18 [diff vs current]

[PATCH V12 05/10] arm64/perf: Add branch stack support in ARMV8 PMU

From: Anshuman Khandual <hidden>
Date: 2023-06-15 13:33:51
Also in: linux-perf-users, lkml
Subsystem: arm pmu profiling and debugging, arm64 port (aarch64 architecture), performance events subsystem, the rest · Maintainers: Will Deacon, Mark Rutland, Catalin Marinas, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Linus Torvalds

This enables support for branch stack sampling event in ARMV8 PMU, checking
has_branch_stack() on the event inside 'struct arm_pmu' callbacks. Although
these branch stack helpers armv8pmu_branch_XXXXX() are just dummy functions
for now. While here, this also defines arm_pmu's sched_task() callback with
armv8pmu_sched_task(), which resets the branch record buffer on a sched_in.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: James Clark <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h | 31 +++++++++++
 drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c            | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
index eb7071c9eb34..ebc392ba3559 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -24,4 +24,35 @@ extern unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
 	(regs)->pstate = PSR_MODE_EL1h;	\
 }
 
+struct pmu_hw_events;
+struct arm_pmu;
+struct perf_event;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
+static inline bool has_branch_stack(struct perf_event *event);
+
+static inline void armv8pmu_branch_read(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!has_branch_stack(event));
+}
+
+static inline bool armv8pmu_branch_attr_valid(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!has_branch_stack(event));
+	return false;
+}
+
+static inline void armv8pmu_branch_enable(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!has_branch_stack(event));
+}
+
+static inline void armv8pmu_branch_disable(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!has_branch_stack(event));
+}
+
+static inline void armv8pmu_branch_probe(struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu) { }
+static inline void armv8pmu_branch_reset(void) { }
+#endif
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
index c98e4039386d..54c80f393eb6 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c
@@ -705,38 +705,21 @@ static void armv8pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 	 * Enable counter and interrupt, and set the counter to count
 	 * the event that we're interested in.
 	 */
-
-	/*
-	 * Disable counter
-	 */
 	armv8pmu_disable_event_counter(event);
-
-	/*
-	 * Set event.
-	 */
 	armv8pmu_write_event_type(event);
-
-	/*
-	 * Enable interrupt for this counter
-	 */
 	armv8pmu_enable_event_irq(event);
-
-	/*
-	 * Enable counter
-	 */
 	armv8pmu_enable_event_counter(event);
+
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		armv8pmu_branch_enable(event);
 }
 
 static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	/*
-	 * Disable counter
-	 */
-	armv8pmu_disable_event_counter(event);
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		armv8pmu_branch_disable(event);
 
-	/*
-	 * Disable interrupt for this counter
-	 */
+	armv8pmu_disable_event_counter(event);
 	armv8pmu_disable_event_irq(event);
 }
 
@@ -814,6 +797,11 @@ static irqreturn_t armv8pmu_handle_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
 		if (!armpmu_event_set_period(event))
 			continue;
 
+		if (has_branch_stack(event) && !WARN_ON(!cpuc->branches)) {
+			armv8pmu_branch_read(cpuc, event);
+			perf_sample_save_brstack(&data, event, &cpuc->branches->branch_stack);
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * Perf event overflow will queue the processing of the event as
 		 * an irq_work which will be taken care of in the handling of
@@ -912,6 +900,14 @@ static int armv8pmu_user_event_idx(struct perf_event *event)
 	return event->hw.idx;
 }
 
+static void armv8pmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_pmu_context *pmu_ctx, bool sched_in)
+{
+	struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(pmu_ctx->pmu);
+
+	if (sched_in && armpmu->has_branch_stack)
+		armv8pmu_branch_reset();
+}
+
 /*
  * Add an event filter to a given event.
  */
@@ -982,6 +978,9 @@ static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info)
 		pmcr |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
 
 	armv8pmu_pmcr_write(pmcr);
+
+	if (cpu_pmu->has_branch_stack)
+		armv8pmu_branch_reset();
 }
 
 static int __armv8_pmuv3_map_event_id(struct arm_pmu *armpmu,
@@ -1019,6 +1018,9 @@ static int __armv8_pmuv3_map_event(struct perf_event *event,
 
 	hw_event_id = __armv8_pmuv3_map_event_id(armpmu, event);
 
+	if (has_branch_stack(event) && !armv8pmu_branch_attr_valid(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	/*
 	 * CHAIN events only work when paired with an adjacent counter, and it
 	 * never makes sense for a user to open one in isolation, as they'll be
@@ -1135,6 +1137,33 @@ static void __armv8pmu_probe_pmu(void *info)
 		cpu_pmu->reg_pmmir = read_pmmir();
 	else
 		cpu_pmu->reg_pmmir = 0;
+	armv8pmu_branch_probe(cpu_pmu);
+}
+
+static int branch_records_alloc(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+{
+	struct branch_records __percpu *records;
+	int cpu;
+
+	records = alloc_percpu_gfp(struct branch_records, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!records)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	/*
+	 * FIXME: Memory allocated via records gets completely
+	 * consumed here, never required to be freed up later. Hence
+	 * losing access to on stack 'records' is acceptable.
+	 * Otherwise this alloc handle has to be saved some where.
+	 */
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		struct pmu_hw_events *events_cpu;
+		struct branch_records *records_cpu;
+
+		events_cpu = per_cpu_ptr(armpmu->hw_events, cpu);
+		records_cpu = per_cpu_ptr(records, cpu);
+		events_cpu->branches = records_cpu;
+	}
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int armv8pmu_probe_pmu(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -1151,7 +1180,15 @@ static int armv8pmu_probe_pmu(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	return probe.present ? 0 : -ENODEV;
+	if (!probe.present)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	if (cpu_pmu->has_branch_stack) {
+		ret = branch_records_alloc(cpu_pmu);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void armv8pmu_disable_user_access_ipi(void *unused)
@@ -1214,6 +1251,7 @@ static int armv8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, char *name,
 	cpu_pmu->set_event_filter	= armv8pmu_set_event_filter;
 
 	cpu_pmu->pmu.event_idx		= armv8pmu_user_event_idx;
+	cpu_pmu->sched_task		= armv8pmu_sched_task;
 
 	cpu_pmu->name			= name;
 	cpu_pmu->map_event		= map_event;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help