Thread (28 messages) read the whole thread 28 messages, 5 authors, 2023-06-09

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] efi: Add tee-based EFI variable driver

From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Date: 2023-06-07 16:04:29
Also in: linux-efi, lkml, op-tee

On 07.06.23 17:18, Sumit Garg wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 18:10, Jan Kiszka [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 07.06.23 10:25, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
quoted
Hi Sumit,

On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 10:25, Sumit Garg [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Ilias,

On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 12:05, Ilias Apalodimas
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Jan,

[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
...
quoted
quoted
I think we have a probe ordering issue with this driver:
efivarfs_fill_super() may be called before the TEE bus was probed, thus
with the default efivar ops still registered. And that means
efivar_supports_writes() will return false, and the fs declares itself
as readonly. I've seen systemd mounting it r/o initialling, and you need
to remount the fs to enable writability.

Is there anything that could be done to re-order things reliably, probe
the tee bus earlier etc.?
This driver has a dependency on user-space daemon: tee-supplicant to
be running for RPMB access. So once you start that daemon the
corresponding device will be enumerated on the TEE bus and this driver
probe will be invoked. So I would suggest you to load this daemon very
early in the boot process or better to make it a part of initramfs.
That is not the point, really.

If this dependency exists, the code should be aware of that, and made
to work correctly in spite of it. Requiring a module to be part of
initramfs is not a reasonable fix.
In fact, I've tested a non-modularized build as well, just to exclude
that issue. The daemon dependency is more likely the problem here.
quoted
IIUC, this also means that the efivar ops are updated while there is
already a client. This seems less than ideal as well
As Sumit pointed out, the 'device' won't be available from OP-TEE
until the supplicant is up and running and as a result, the module
_probe() function won't run.  Unfortunately, this isn't something we
can avoid since the supplicant is responsible for the RPMB writes.
The only thing I can think of is moving parts of the supplicant to the
kernel and wiring up the RPC calls for reading/writing data to the
eMMC subsystem.  There was another discussion here [0] requesting the
same thing for different reasons. But unless I am missing something
this won't solve the problem completely either.  You still have a
timing dependency of "when did the RT callbacks change" -- "when was
my efivarfs mounted".
With the RPMB writes wired through the kernel [1], the only dependency
left is when do you load the tee-stmm-efi driver to have real EFI
runtime variables support. IMO, tee-stmm-efi driver should be built-in
to support systems without initramfs. The distro installers may choose
to bundle it in initramfs. Do you still see a timing dependency with
this approach?
No I don't, this will work reliably without the need to remount the efivarfs.
As you point out you will still have this dependency if you end up
building them as modules and you manage to mount the efivarfs before
those get inserted.  Does anyone see a reasonable workaround?
Deceiving the kernel and making the bootloader set the RT property bit
to force the filesystem being mounted as rw is a nasty hack that we
should avoid.  Maybe adding a kernel command line parameter that says
"Ignore the RTPROP I know what I am doing"?  I don't particularly love
this either, but it's not unreasonable.
In the context of https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/6094,
basically this issue mapped on reboot/shutdown, I would really love to
see the unhandy tee-supplicant daemon to be overcome.
I have seen this error before and it has been on my todo list. So I
have tried to fix it here [1]. Feel free to test it and let me know if
you see any further issues.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/6/7/927
Ah, nice, will test ASAP!

Meanwhile more food: I managed to build a firmware that was missing 
STMM. But the driver loaded, and I got this:

root@iot2050-debian:~# efi-updatevar -f PK.auth PK
[  243.407097] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000
[  243.415959] Mem abort info:
[  243.418801]   ESR = 0x86000004
[  243.422099]   EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[  243.427529]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
[  243.430755]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[  243.433931] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000008b74e000
[  243.440438] [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
[  243.447274] Internal error: Oops: 86000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  243.452835] Modules linked in: ctr ccm mt7601u mac80211 cfg80211 rfkill libarc4 cp210x usbserial pci_endpoint_test ti_k3_r5_remoteproc optee_rng rng_core ti_cal ti_am335x_adc videobuf2_dma_contig kfifo_buf v4l2_fwnode videobuf2_memops videobuf2_v4l2 videobuf2_common irq_pruss_intc at24 fuse ip_tables x_tables ipv6 tpm_ftpm_tee icssg_prueth pru_rproc icss_iep ptp pps_core ti_am335x_tscadc pruss
[  243.487733] CPU: 0 PID: 875 Comm: efi-updatevar Not tainted 5.10.162-cip24 #1
[  243.494851] Hardware name: Unknown Unknown Product/Unknown Product, BIOS 2023.07-rc3-00018-g0afdaac6505 07/01/2023
[  243.505180] pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
[  243.511179] pc : 0x0
[  243.513366] lr : efivar_entry_set_get_size+0xd4/0x1e0
[  243.518404] sp : ffff8000127a3d00
[  243.521708] x29: ffff8000127a3d00 x28: 0000000000000f87 
[  243.527012] x27: ffff000005bae400 x26: ffff800011254000 
[  243.532315] x25: ffff000005baf000 x24: ffff800011254aa0 
[  243.537618] x23: ffff8000127a3dab x22: ffff8000111d0268 
[  243.542921] x21: ffff8000127a3db0 x20: 0000000000000000 
[  243.548224] x19: ffff000005bae000 x18: 0000000000000000 
[  243.553527] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 
[  243.558829] x15: 0000aaab0876f264 x14: 35cd6a1025d11a20 
[  243.564132] x13: ac6f8dda3945638d x12: fb482642e3487f2d 
[  243.569435] x11: 0000000000000003 x10: ffff00000b792a80 
[  243.574738] x9 : a098e2bf989ff097 x8 : 0000000000000010 
[  243.580041] x7 : ffff800010e35c00 x6 : 4ddcbe2ecfc8fc79 
[  243.585345] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff000005baf000 
[  243.590647] x3 : 0000000000000f87 x2 : 0000000000000027 
[  243.595950] x1 : ffff000005bae400 x0 : ffff000005bae000 
[  243.601254] Call trace:
[  243.603695]  0x0
[  243.605531]  efivarfs_file_write+0xa4/0x170
[  243.609709]  vfs_write+0xf0/0x2a4
[  243.613016]  ksys_write+0x68/0xf4
[  243.616323]  __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x2c
[  243.620241]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x78/0x1c4
[  243.625022]  do_el0_svc+0x24/0x8c
[  243.628331]  el0_svc+0x14/0x20
[  243.631378]  el0_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb4
[  243.635206]  el0_sync+0x180/0x1c0
[  243.638523] Code: bad PC value
[  243.641573] ---[ end trace 369e4632cb003adc ]---

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help