Thread (37 messages) 37 messages, 8 authors, 2023-06-25

Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] perf vendor events: Add JSON metrics for CMN

From: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: 2023-06-01 09:05:04
Also in: linux-perf-users, lkml


在 2023/5/31 上午9:18, Ian Rogers 写道:
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 2:19 AM Jing Zhang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Add JSON metrics for arm CMN. Currently just add part of CMN PMU
metrics which are general and compatible for any SoC and CMN-ANY.

Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 .../pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cmn/sys/metrics.json | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py                   |  1 +
 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cmn/sys/metrics.json
diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cmn/sys/metrics.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cmn/sys/metrics.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e70ac1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cmn/sys/metrics.json
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+[
+       {
+               "MetricName": "slc_miss_rate",
+               "BriefDescription": "The system level cache miss rate include.",
Nit, partial sentence?
Yes my mistake.
quoted
+               "MetricGroup": "arm_cmn",
+               "MetricExpr": "hnf_cache_miss / hnf_slc_sf_cache_access",
+               "ScaleUnit": "100%",
+               "Unit": "arm_cmn",
+               "Compat": "arm_cmn600;arm_cmn650;arm_cmn700;arm_ci700"
+       },
+       {
+               "MetricName": "hnf_message_retry_rate",
+               "BriefDescription": "HN-F message retry rate indicates whether a lack of credits is causing the bottlenecks.",
+               "MetricGroup": "arm_cmn",
+               "MetricExpr": "hnf_pocq_retry / hnf_pocq_reqs_recvd",
+               "ScaleUnit": "100%",
+               "Unit": "arm_cmn",
+               "Compat": "arm_cmn600;arm_cmn650;arm_cmn700;arm_ci700"
+       },
+       {
+               "MetricName": "sf_hit_rate",
+               "BriefDescription": "Snoop filter hit rate can be used to measure the Snoop Filter efficiency.",
Nit, inconsistent capitalization?
Ok, fix it in next version.
quoted
+               "MetricGroup": "arm_cmn",
+               "MetricExpr": "hnf_sf_hit / hnf_slc_sf_cache_access",
+               "ScaleUnit": "100%",
+               "Unit": "arm_cmn",
+               "Compat": "arm_cmn600;arm_cmn650;arm_cmn700;arm_ci700"
+       },
+       {
+               "MetricName": "mc_message_retry_rate",
+               "BriefDescription": "The memory controller request retries rate indicates whether the memory controller is the bottleneck.",
+               "MetricGroup": "arm_cmn",
+               "MetricExpr": "hnf_mc_retries / hnf_mc_reqs",
+               "ScaleUnit": "100%",
+               "Unit": "arm_cmn",
+               "Compat": "arm_cmn600;arm_cmn650;arm_cmn700;arm_ci700"
+       },
+       {
+               "MetricName": "rni_actual_read_bandwidth.all",
+               "BriefDescription": "This event measure the actual bandwidth(MB/sec) that RN-I bridge sends to the interconnect.",
Nit, the MB/sec is in the ScaleUnit so could be dropped here.
ok
quoted
+               "MetricGroup": "arm_cmn",
+               "MetricExpr": "rnid_rxdat_flits * 32 / 1e6 / duration_time",
+               "ScaleUnit": "1MB/s",
+               "Unit": "arm_cmn",
+               "Compat": "arm_cmn600;arm_cmn650;arm_cmn700;arm_ci700"
+       },
+       {
+               "MetricName": "rni_actual_write_bandwidth.all",
+               "BriefDescription": "This event measures the actual write bandwidth(MB/sec) at RN-I bridges.",
Nit, same thing.
ok
quoted
+               "MetricGroup": "arm_cmn",
+               "MetricExpr": "rnid_txdat_flits * 32 / 1e6 / duration_time",
+               "ScaleUnit": "1MB/s",
+               "Unit": "arm_cmn",
+               "Compat": "arm_cmn600;arm_cmn650;arm_cmn700;arm_ci700"
+       },
+       {
+               "MetricName": "rni_retry_rate",
+               "BriefDescription": "RN-I bridge retry rate indicates whether the memory controller is the bottleneck.",
+               "MetricGroup": "arm_cmn",
+               "MetricExpr": "rnid_txreq_flits_retried / rnid_txreq_flits_total",
+               "ScaleUnit": "100%",
+               "Unit": "arm_cmn",
+               "Compat": "arm_cmn600;arm_cmn650;arm_cmn700;arm_ci700"
+       },
+       {
+               "MetricName": "sbsx_actual_write_bandwidth.all",
+               "BriefDescription": "sbsx actual write bandwidth(MB/sec).",
Nit, same thing.
Ok, Thanks Ian.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help