Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/process: add soc maintainer handbook
From: Bagas Sanjaya <hidden>
Date: 2023-05-31 06:30:23
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-doc, linux-riscv, lkml
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 01:49:36PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9683c7d199b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-soc.rst@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +.. _maintainer-soc: + +============= +SoC Subsystem +============= + +Overview +-------- + +The SoC subsystem is a place of aggregation for SoC-specific code. +The main components of the subsystem are: + +* devicetrees for 32- & 64-bit ARM and RISC-V +* 32-bit ARM board files (arch/arm/mach*) +* 32- & 64-bit ARM defconfigs +* SoC specific drivers across architectures, in particular for 32- & 64-bit + ARM, RISC-V and Loongarch + +These "SoC specific drivers" do not include clock, GPIO etc drivers that have +other top-level maintainers. The drivers/soc/ directory is generally meant +for kernel-internal drivers that are used by other drivers to provide SoC +specific functionality like identifying a SoC revision or interfacing with +power domains. + +The SoC subsystem also serves as an intermediate location for changes to +drivers/bus, drivers/firmware, drivers/reset and drivers/memory. The addition +of new platforms, or the removal of existing ones, often go through the SoC +tree as a dedicated branch covering multiple subsystems. + +The main SoC tree is housed on git.kernel.org: + https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git/ + +Clearly this is quite a wide range of topics, which no one person, or even +small group of people are capable of maintaining. Instead, the SoC subsystem +is comprised of many submaintainers, each taking care of individual platforms +and driver sub-directories. +In this regard, "platform" usually refers to a series of SoCs from a given +vendor, for example, Nvidia's series of Tegra SoCs. Many submaintainers operate +on a vendor level, responsible for multiple product lines. For several reasons, +including acquisitions/different business units in a company, things vary +significantly here. The various submaintainers are documented in the +MAINTAINERS file. + +Most of these submaintainers have their own trees where they stage patches, +sending pull requests to the main SoC tree. These trees are usually, but not +always, listed in MAINTAINERS. The main SoC maintainers can be reached via the +alias soc@kernel.org if there is no platform-specific maintainer, or if they +are unresponsive. + +What the SoC tree is not, however, is a location for architecture specific code +changes. Each architecture has it's own maintainers that are responsible for +architectural details, cpu errata and the like. + +Information for (new) Submaintainers +------------------------------------ + +As new platforms spring up, they often bring with them new submaintainers, +many of whom work for the silicon vendor, and may not be familiar with the +process. + +Devicetree ABI Stability +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Perhaps one of the most important things to highlight is that dt-bindings +document the ABI between the devicetree and the kernel. Please see +:ref:`devicetree-abi` more information on the ABI. + +If changes are being made to a devicetree that are incompatible with old +kernels, the devicetree patch should not be applied until the driver is, or an
Until the incompatible driver changes are merged?
+appropriate time later. Most importantly, any incompatible changes should be +clearly pointed out in the patch description and pull request, along with the +expected impact on existing users, such as bootloaders or other operating +systems. + +Driver Branch Dependencies +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +A common problem is synchronizing changes between device drivers and devicetree +files, even if a change is compatible in both directions, this may require +coordinating how the changes get merged through different maintainer trees. + +Usually the branch that includes a driver change will also include the +corresponding change to the devicetree binding description, to ensure they are +in fact compatible. This means that the devicetree branch can end up causing +warnings in the "make dtbs_check" step. If a devicetree change depends on +missing additions to a header file in include/dt-bindings/, it will fail the +"make dtbs" step and not get merged.
Sounds like passing `make dtbs` is a merging requirement.
+Pull requests for bugfixes for the current release can be sent at any time, but +again having multiple smaller branches is better than trying to combine too many +patches into one pull request. + +The subject line of a pull request should begin with "[GIT PULL]" and made using +a signed tag, rather than a branch. This tag should contain a short description +summarising the changes in the pull request. For more detail on sending pull +requests, please see :ref:`pullrequests`.
As jon had said, I simply prefer to write the last cross-ref as:
... For more details on sending pull requests, see Documentation/maintainer/pull-requests.rst.
Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara