On Tue, 30 May 2023 at 11:29, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, May 30, 2023, at 06:19, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

quoted

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the gpio-brgl tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpio/gpio-twl4030.c

between commit:

  d5f4fa60d63a ("ARM/gpio: Push OMAP2 quirk down into TWL4030 driver")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

  fbc8ab2ccd85 ("gpio: twl4030: Use devm_gpiochip_add_data() to
simplify remove path")

from the gpio-brgl tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

Maybe Bartosz wants to merge Linus' gpio-omap-descriptors-v6.5 series
into the gpio/for-next branch as well? It touches both the
arch/arm/mach-omap and a lot of the drivers using the gpios, so we
could treat this as a shared immutable branch.

    Arnd

I was about to ask for an immutable tag. :)

Linus, is this the right tag to pull from your tree?

Bart

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel