Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 3 authors, 2023-06-10

Re: [PATCH net-next 08/30] net: dsa: mt7530: change p{5,6}_interface to p{5,6}_configured

From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-05-26 13:01:54
Also in: linux-mediatek, lkml, netdev

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 09:49:58AM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
On 24.05.2023 20:51, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
quoted
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:15:10PM +0300, arinc9.unal@gmail.com wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
index 710c6622d648..d837aa20968c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
@@ -2728,25 +2722,20 @@ mt753x_phylink_mac_config(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, unsigned int mode,
  			goto unsupported;
  		break;
  	case 5: /* Port 5, can be used as a CPU port. */
-		if (priv->p5_interface == state->interface)
+		if (priv->p5_configured)
  			break;
  		if (mt753x_mac_config(ds, port, mode, state) < 0)
  			goto unsupported;
-
-		if (priv->p5_intf_sel != P5_DISABLED)
-			priv->p5_interface = state->interface;
If you don't replace this bit with anything, who will set priv->p5_configured
for mt7530?
I intend priv->p5_configured and priv->p6_configured to be only used for
MT7531 as I have stated on the mt7530_priv description.
Ok, but given the premise of this patch set, that phylink is always available,
does it make sense for mt7531_cpu_port_config() and mt7988_cpu_port_config()
to manually call phylink methods?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help