Thus wrote Arnd Bergmann (arnd@arndb.de):

I think either way is ok to address the warning. If we wanted to do this
properly, the mx{25,27,31,35,5}_revision functions could all be removed
and the logic hooked up to imx_set_soc_revision() in the same way that
they already use mxc_set_cpu_type() for drivers/soc/imx/soc-imx.c.

I'll leave it up to you, if you want to merge Martin's patches or
a replacement for the soc-imx driver through the imx tree for 6.5,
I'll drop my patch from this series, otherwise I'll keep it for now
and we can still do it better at later point.

I suggest we merge my patches for imx25 first and then clean up all the
older imx families to use the common functions.

I've just rebased the patches against today's linux-next. My understanding
is that they have to go through the clk tree.

Thanks,
Martin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel