Re: [PATCH 4/14] audit: avoid missing-prototype warnings
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2023-05-17 14:52:02
Also in:
linux-kselftest, linux-mips, linux-mm, linux-pm, linux-riscv, linux-s390, linux-sh, linuxppc-dev, lkml
On Wed, May 17, 2023, at 16:33, Paul Moore wrote:
On May 17, 2023 Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
We probably should move the audit_serial() and auditsc_get_stamp() away from the watch/mark/tree functions, but that isn't your problem. Anyway, this looks okay to me; do you have a problem if I merge this via the audit/next branch or were you hoping to have this go in through a different tree?
Merging it through your tree is probably best, Andrew can either
pick the ones that nobody else took, or I can resend the rest.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel