On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 7:19 AM Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, May 3, 2023, at 14:13, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 13:39, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
So with pxa93x out of the picture, we can simplify it as using
'pxa' as the name for all the above chips with an Intel XScale
core, and 'marvell' for all the other ones that have a Marvell
core and exist in mach-mmp.
Should it be 'intel' for pxa[23]xx then?
Probably yes, that would put it next to ixp4xx, which makes
a lot of sense (same vintage, same cpu core), though it is
a bit funny to have these together with lsi axxia and
altera socfpga, both of which are also in the intel
directory. socfpga is of course the only one that anybody
at Intel cares about these days.
We could do a second level of directories here:
intel/pxa/
intel/ixp/
intel/socfpga/
arm64 broadcom dts files are structured that way.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel