On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 10:10:58AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:40:13AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 01:18:43AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:

quoted

Hi Shawn,

quoted

Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 10/10] ARM64: dts: imx7ulp: update usb compatible

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 01:25:04PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:

quoted

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Per binding doc, update the compatible

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

ARM: dts: imx7ulp: ...

Fixed it up and applied all DTS patches.

[Peng Fan] 

Thanks for the fix. But I think Greg already applied the patchset.

Okay, I will drop them from my tree, but ...

Greg,

May I suggest a couple of things on the future process?

- Could you leave i.MX DTS patches to me, so that we can avoid potential
  merge conflicts?

How am I supposed to know this?

Aren't we using patch prefix to tell the target subsystem?

Our tools take the whole patch series,
not individual ones.  If someone wants patches to go through different
trees, then they need to submit them as different patch series,
otherwise it makes no sense.

It's a quite common practice that people send a series containing
multiple patches targeting different subsystems, as that's what
reviewers have been asking for sake of completeness.  So we are asking
for two opposite things from what I can see.

Shawn

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel