Le 30/03/2023 à 12:03, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, at 09:48, Neil Armstrong wrote:

quoted

On 27/03/2023 14:13, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

The cache management operations for noncoherent DMA on ARMv6 work
in two different ways:

   * When CONFIG_DMA_CACHE_RWFO is set, speculative prefetches on in-flight
     DMA buffers lead to data corruption when the prefetched data is written
     back on top of data from the device.

   * When CONFIG_DMA_CACHE_RWFO is disabled, a cache flush on one CPU
     is not seen by the other core(s), leading to inconsistent contents
     accross the system.

As a consequence, neither configuration is actually safe to use in a
general-purpose kernel that is used on both MPCore systems and ARM1176
with prefetching enabled.

We could add further workarounds to make the behavior more dynamic based
on the system, but realistically, there are close to zero remaining
users on any ARM11MPCore anyway, and nobody seems too interested in it,
compared to the more popular ARM1176 used in BMC2835 and AST2500.

The Oxnas platform has some minimal support in OpenWRT, but most of the
drivers and dts files never made it into the mainline kernel, while the
Arm Versatile/Realview platform mainly serves as a reference system but
is not necessary to be kept working once all other ARM11MPCore are gone.

Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>

It's sad but it's the reality, there's no chance full OXNAS support will
ever come upstream and no real work has been done for years.

I think OXNAS support can be programmed for removal for next release,
it would need significant work to rework current support to make it acceptable
before trying to upstream missing bits anyway.

Ok, thanks for your reply!

To clarify, do you think we should plan for removal after the next
stable release (6.3, removed in 6.4), or after the next LTS
release (probably 6.6, removed in 6.7)? As far as I understand,
the next OpenWRT release (23.x) will be based on linux-5.15,
and the one after that (24.x) would likely still use 6.1, unless
they skip an LTS kernel.

I think it's ok to remove it ASAP, or at least before the next LTS,
not having SMP makes the platform barely usable so the earliest is the best.

Neil

      Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel