Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 2 authors, 2023-03-23

Re: [PATCH v8 06/11] remoteproc: mediatek: Probe multi-core SCP

From: TingHan Shen (沈廷翰) <hidden>
Date: 2023-03-23 02:02:24
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, linux-remoteproc, lkml

Hi Mathieu,

On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 15:07 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 04:33:50PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
quoted
The difference of single-core SCP and multi-core SCP device tree is
the presence of child device nodes described SCP cores. The SCP
driver populates the platform device and checks the child nodes
to identify whether it's a single-core SCP or a multi-core SCP.

The resource structure of the multi-core SCP is a list of remoteproc
instances which is different to the single-core SCP. The corresponding
resource releasing action is based on the type of SCP.

Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <redacted>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |   4 +
 drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 177 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
(snip)
quoted
This code is complex and hard to read because rproc_add() is called in two
different context.  From a code perspective single core remote processors should
be treated as a one core cluster.

I am done reviewing this patchset.

Thanks,
Mathieu
I'll improve my patchset in the next version.
Thank you for the review comments!


quoted
+		if (ret)
+			goto add_fail;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+add_fail:
+	list_for_each_entry_continue(scp, cluster, elem) {
+		rproc_del(scp->rproc);
+	}
+init_fail:
+	if (cluster) {
+		list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) {
+			list_del(&scp->elem);
+			scp_rproc_free(scp);
+		}
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void scp_cluster_exit(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct list_head *cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct platform_device *cpdev;
+	struct mtk_scp *scp, *temp;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(scp, temp, cluster, elem) {
+		list_del(&scp->elem);
+		cpdev = to_platform_device(scp->dev);
+		scp_rproc_exit(cpdev);
+	}
+}
+
 static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	struct device_node *core_node;
 	struct resource *res;
 	struct mtk_scp_of_regs scp_regs;
 	int ret;
@@ -976,21 +1094,43 @@ static int scp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		scp_regs.l1tcm_phys = res->start;
 	}
 
-	return scp_rproc_init(pdev, &scp_regs);
+	ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to populate platform devices\n");
+
+	core_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "scp");
+	of_node_put(core_node);
Please use of_get_available_child_count()
quoted
+
+	if (!core_node) {
+		dev_info(dev, "single-core scp\n");
+
+		ret = scp_rproc_init(pdev, &scp_regs, of_device_get_match_data(dev), false);
+		if (ret)
+			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to initialize single-core scp\n");
+	} else {
+		dev_info(dev, "multi-core scp\n");
+
+		ret = scp_cluster_init(pdev, &scp_regs);
+		if (ret)
+			return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to initialize scp cluster\n");
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int scp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct mtk_scp *scp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	int i;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	struct device_node *core_node;
 
-	rproc_del(scp->rproc);
-	scp_remove_rpmsg_subdev(scp);
-	scp_ipi_unregister(scp, SCP_IPI_INIT);
-	scp_unmap_memory_region(scp);
-	for (i = 0; i < SCP_IPI_MAX; i++)
-		mutex_destroy(&scp->ipi_desc[i].lock);
-	mutex_destroy(&scp->send_lock);
+	core_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "scp");
+	of_node_put(core_node);
+
+	if (!core_node)
+		scp_rproc_exit(pdev);
+	else
+		scp_cluster_exit(pdev);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1069,12 +1209,19 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data_c1 = {
 	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8195_CORE1_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,
 };
 
+static const struct mtk_scp_of_data *mt8195_of_data_cores[] = {
+	&mt8195_of_data,
+	&mt8195_of_data_c1,
+	NULL
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id mtk_scp_of_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-scp", .data = &mt8183_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-scp", .data = &mt8186_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8188-scp", .data = &mt8188_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-scp", .data = &mt8192_of_data },
 	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp", .data = &mt8195_of_data },
+	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-scp-dual", .data = &mt8195_of_data_cores },
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_scp_of_match);
-- 
2.18.0
-- 
Best regards,
TingHan
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help